The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of systematic search and database methods for constructing segments of protein structure
Abstract
Two principal methods of determining the conformation of short pieces of polypeptide backbone in proteins have been developed: using a database of known structures and systematically generating all conformations. In this paper, we compare the effectiveness of these two techniques. The completeness of the database for segments of different lengths is examined and it is found to contain most conformations for segments seven residues long, but to deteriorate rapidly for longer regions. When the database segment is to be incorporated into the rest of a structure, at least seven residues are required to build four new residues, because of the need to position the segment relative to the rest of the structure. It is found that such positioning using flanking residues results in large errors in the inserted region. We conclude that the database method is currently not effective for comparative modeling, even for short segments. The systematic search procedure is found to generate almost all structures of short segments found in proteins. In contrast to the database method, low root mean square error structures are obtained for a set of trial segments embedded in the rest of a protein structure. Thus, it should be considered the method of choice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Local conformational restraints also greatly reduce the size of the space45.”
From Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round XIV (2021) · cites this paper as [45]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using Modeller
Eswar, N., Webb, B., Martı́-Renom, M. A., Madhusudhan, M. S., Eramian, D., Shen, M., Pieper, U., & Šali, A. (2006) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/0471250953.bi0506s15 · Cited by 4,618
“As a result, only loops up to 4 to 7 residues long have most of their conceivable conformations present in the database of known protein structures (Fidelis et al., 1994; Lessel and Schomburg, 1994).”
Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER
Webb, B., & Šali, A. (2016) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/cpbi.3 · Cited by 4,404
“…database methods are limited because the number of possible conformations increases exponentially with the length of a loop, and until the late 1990s only loops up to 7 residues long could be modeled using the database of known protein structures (Fidelis et al., 1994; Lessel and Schomburg, 1994).”
Comparative Protein Structure Modeling of Genes and Genomes
Martí-Renom, M. A., Stuart, A. C., Fiser, A., Sánchez, R., Melo, F., & Šali, A. (2000) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.291 · Cited by 3,169
“Consequently, only segments of 7 residues or less have most of their conceivable conformations present in the database of known protein structures (48).”
BackgroundComparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER
Eswar, N., Webb, B., Martı́-Renom, M. A., Madhusudhan, M. S., Eramian, D., Shen, M., Pieper, U., & Šali, A. (2007) · Current Protocols in Protein Science · doi:10.1002/0471140864.ps0209s50 · Cited by 2,874
“Correspondingly, the average model accuracy increased from 43% to 54% (the model accuracy was measured as the percentage of the C α atoms of the model that were within 5 ◦ A of the corresponding C α atoms in the superimposed native structure).”
BackgroundModeling of loops in protein structures
Fiser, A., Do, R. K. G., & Šali, A. (2000) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.9.9.1753 · Cited by 2,116
Modeller: Generation and Refinement of Homology-Based Protein Structure Models
Fiser, A., & Šali, A. (2003) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(03)74020-8 · Cited by 1,708
Simons, K. T., Kooperberg, C. L., Huang, E. S., & Baker, D. A. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1997.0959 · Cited by 1,405
“Fidelis et al. (1994) suggested that building structures from fragments was likely to be unsuccessful because of the structural divergence of local fragments and the weakness of local sequence-structural correlation.”
BackgroundComparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER
Webb, B., & Šali, A. (2014) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/0471250953.bi0506s47 · Cited by 1,156
Evaluation of comparative protein modeling by M ODELLER
Šali, A., Potterton, L., Feng, Y., van Vlijmen, H., & Karplus, M. (1995) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340230306 · Cited by 1,088
Zhou, H., & Zhou, Y. (2002) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.0217002 · Cited by 902
“Another multiple decoy set is loops (Moult and James 1986; Fidelis et al. 1994) from http://prostar.”
BackgroundComparative protein modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints
⩽ali, A. (1995) · Molecular Medicine Today · doi:10.1016/s1357-4310(95)91170-7 · Cited by 786
Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER
Webb, B., & Sali, A. (2016) · Current Protocols in Protein Science · doi:10.1002/cpps.20 · Cited by 730
“…database methods are limited because the number of possible conformations increases exponentially with the length of a loop, and until the late 1990s only loops up to 7 residues long could be modeled using the database of known protein structures (Fidelis et al., 1994; Lessel and Schomburg, 1994).”
BackgroundCritical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round XIV
Kryshtafovych, A., Schwede, T., Topf, M., Fidelis, K., & Moult, J. (2021) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26237 · Cited by 503
“Local conformational restraints also greatly reduce the size of the space.(45) More concrete evidence for this conclusion is provided by the large number of designed proteins that have now been made, with no explicit design of a pathway.”
BackgroundSelf-citationAdvances in Homology Protein Structure Modeling
Xiang, Z. (2006) · Current Protein and Peptide Science · doi:10.2174/138920306777452312 · Cited by 479
Samudrala, R., & Moult, J. (1998) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1997.1479 · Cited by 441
“This decoy set consists of sets of conformations for short loops (four or ®ve residues) that were systematically generated using the methods of Moult & James (1986) and Fidelis et al. (1994).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationXiang, Z., Soto, C. S., & Honig, B. H. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.102179699 · Cited by 367
Advances in comparative protein-structure modelling
Sánchez, R., & Šali, A. (1997) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(97)80027-9 · Cited by 331
Modeling structurally variable regions in homologous proteins with rosetta
Rohl, C. A., Strauss, C. E. M., Chivian, D. C., & Baker, D. A. (2004) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10629 · Cited by 328
“…to the SVR following optimal superposition of these stem residues. mations for protein segments up to about five or six residues are adequately sampled in known protein structures, 47 and fragment assembly is unlikely to significantly improve the accuracy of predictions for segments below this size.”
BackgroundAl‐Lazikani, B., Jung, J., Xiang, Z., & Honig, B. H. (2001) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/s1367-5931(00)00164-2 · Cited by 323
Template-Based Protein Structure Modeling
Fiser, A. (2010) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-842-3_6 · Cited by 264
FREAD revisited: accurate loop structure prediction using a database search algorithm
Choi, Y., & Deane, C. M. (2010) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22658 · Cited by 161
“…The predictive power of database search methods has been questioned and ab initio loop prediction has been thought to be more effective.25 ,26 A recent benchmark27 of four commercial modeling protocols for loop structure prediction (two ab initio : MODELLER11 and PRIME—a commercial…”
MethodPDB-based protein loop prediction: parameters for selection and methods for optimization
van Vlijmen, H., & Karplus, M. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0857 · Cited by 161
“Fidelis et al. (1994) conclude that database searches are limited to loops of four residues.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential3D‐SHOTGUN: A novel, cooperative, fold‐recognition meta‐predictor
Fischer, D. (2003) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10357 · Cited by 161
“18–20,31, and 32).”
Modelling mutations and homologous proteins
Šali, A. (1995) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/0958-1669(95)80074-3 · Cited by 160
A graph-theoretic algorithm for comparative modeling of protein structure
Samudrala, R., & Moult, J. (1998) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1998.1689 · Cited by 157
“Limitations in accuracy are partly imposed by the loop main-chain sampling of the data base method (Fidelis et al., 1994).”
BackgroundSelf-citationCODA: A combined algorithm for predicting the structurally variable regions of protein models
Deane, C. M., & Blundell, T. L. (2001) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.37601 · Cited by 151
“As has been argued by Martin et al. (1989), the different methods used in the literature for superposition can give rise to divergent calculations of rmsd (Fidelis et al. 1994), and these are very seldom specified in publications.”
MethodInfluentialde Bakker, P. I. W., DePristo, M. A., Burke, D. F., & Blundell, T. L. (2003) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10235 · Cited by 143
DePristo, M. A., de Bakker, P. I. W., Lovell, S. C., & Blundell, T. L. (2003) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10285 · Cited by 140
Comparative Protein Structure Modelling
Fiser, A. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9058-5_3 · Cited by 133
Evolution and Physics in Comparative Protein Structure Modeling
Fiser, A., Feig, M., Brooks, C. L., & Šali, A. (2002) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar010061h · Cited by 102
The H3 loop of antibodies shows unique structural characteristics
Regep, C., Georges, G., Shi, J., Popovic, B., & Deane, C. M. (2017) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25291 · Cited by 99
Comparative Protein Structure Modeling and its Applications to Drug Discovery
Jacobson, M. P., & Šali, A. (2004) · Annual reports in medicinal chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0065-7743(04)39020-2 · Cited by 97
Wojcik, J., Mornon, J., & Chomilier, J. (1999) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.2826 · Cited by 98
Koehl, P., & Delarue, M. H. (1995) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb0295-163 · Cited by 96
Oliva, B., Bates, P. A., Querol, E., Avilés, F. X., & Sternberg, M. J. E. (1998) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1998.1847 · Cited by 82
Inverse Kinematics in Biology: The Protein Loop Closure Problem
Kolodny, R., Guibas, L., Levitt, M., et al. (2005) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364905050352 · Cited by 82
“However, Fidelis et al. (1994) concluded that the use of segments from the PDB was useful only for loops up to a length of four residues, as the completeness of the database degrades rapidly with increasing length.”
BackgroundMethodPredicting protein three-dimensional structure
Moult, J. (1999) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0958-1669(99)00037-3 · Cited by 82
Self-citationOPUS‐Ca: A knowledge‐based potential function requiring only Cα positions
Wu, Y., Lu, M., Chen, M., Li, J., & Ma, J. (2007) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.072796107 · Cited by 80
“The procedure was based on the observation that main chain conformation can be mostly determined by local conformation of C a atoms (Fidelis et al. 1994; Milik et al. 1997).”
MethodA supersecondary structure library and search algorithm for modeling loops in protein structures
Fernandez-Fuentes, N. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkl156 · Cited by 76
Protein structure modeling in the proteomics era
Fiser, A. (2004) · Expert Review of Proteomics · doi:10.1586/14789450.1.1.97 · Cited by 70
A divide and conquer approach to fast loop modeling
Tosatto, S. C. E., Bindewald, E., Hesser, J., & Männer, R. (2002) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/15.4.279 · Cited by 67
“Combinatorial approaches have been studied by several groups (Moult and James, 1986; Bruccoleri et al., 1988; Brower et al., 1993; Bruccoleri, 1993; Fidelis et al., 1994; Pedersen and Moult, 1995; Deane and Blundell, 2000).”
BackgroundReconstruction of Protein Backbones from the BriX Collection of Canonical Protein Fragments
Baeten, L., Reumers, J., Tur, V., Stricher, F., Lenaerts, T., Serrano, L. G., Rousseau, F., & Schymkowitz, J. W. H. (2008) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000083 · Cited by 64
“In previous studies [40,45] loop structures were considered as seven-residue fragments with less than four continuous a-helical or b-strand residues as defined by DSSP.”
BackgroundLarge-scale comparison of protein sequence alignment algorithms with structure alignments
Sauder, J. M., Arthur, J. W., & Dunbrack, R. L. (2000) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(20000701)40:1 · Cited by 250
High‐resolution prediction of protein helix positions and orientations
Li, X., Jacobson, M. P., & Friesner, R. A. (2004) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20014 · Cited by 60
New approaches in molecular structure prediction
Böhm, G. (1996) · Biophysical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/0301-4622(95)00120-4 · Cited by 60
Modeling Structures and Motions of Loops in Protein Molecules
Shehu, A., & Kavraki, L. E. (2012) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e14020252 · Cited by 62
A Guide to Template Based Structure Prediction
Qu, X., Swanson, R., Day, R., & Tsai, J. W. (2009) · Current Protein and Peptide Science · doi:10.2174/138920309788452182 · Cited by 47
Local structure prediction with local structure-based sequence profiles
Yang, A., & Wang, L.-Y. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg151 · Cited by 44
“…work on protein structure prediction has shown that local structure predictions are useful in predicting protein structures from protein sequences (Baldwin and Rose, 1999; Bonneau et al., 2001; Fidelis et al., 1994; Rooman et al., 1991; Simon et al., 1991; Unger et al., 1989; Yang and Wang, 2002).”
BackgroundSaturating representation of loop conformational fragments in structure databanks.
Fernández‐Fuentes, N., & Fiser, A. (2006) · BMC Structural Biology · doi:10.1186/1472-6807-6-15 · Cited by 43
“It was concluded that only segments of 7 residues or less (4 loop and 1+2 anchor residues) had most of their conceivable conformations present in the database of known protein structures[11].”
InfluentialOn the properties and sequence context of structurally ambivalent fragments in proteins
Kuznetsov, I. B., & Rackovsky, S. R. (2003) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.03209703 · Cited by 43
“…is consistent with a previous conclusion that sequence fragments greater than size 7 are not well represented in the database of known structures, and there is no prospect for obtaining a large enough database to adequately represent fragments longer than eight residues (Fidelis et al. 1994).”
BackgroundResultModeling protein loops using a ϕi+1, Ψi dimer database
Sudarsanam, S., DuBose, R. F., March, C. J., & Srinivasan, S. (1995) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.5560040715 · Cited by 43
Protein fragment clustering and canonical local shapes
Hunter, C. G., & Subramaniam, S. (2003) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10309 · Cited by 40
“particular, what is important is how well the database represents the conformational space of local shapes.(18)”
BackgroundMishra, S. K., Saxena, A., & Sangwan, R. S. (2013) · Science International · doi:10.17311/sciintl.2013.237.252 · Cited by 41
Westhead, D. R., & Thornton, J. M. (1998) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0958-1669(98)80012-8 · Cited by 38
Improved protein loop prediction from sequence alone
Burke, D. F., & Deane, C. M. (2001) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/14.7.473 · Cited by 37
“As has been noted before (Fidelis et al., 1994; Wojcik et al., 1999), comparison of the accuracy of any loop prediction method with other loop prediction methods is sometimes complicated by the fact that different atoms are used to calculate the final r.m.s.d. of the loop.”
ResultDocking macromolecules with flexible segments
Bastard, K., Thureau, A., Lavery, R., et al. (2003) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.10329 · Cited by 34
Church, W. B., JONES, K. A., Kuiper, D. A., Shine, J., & Iismaa, T. P. (2002) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/15.4.313 · Cited by 33
“…of variable regions in proteins: first, random generation of loop atoms in torsional space (Fine et al., 1986), and second, the ‘fitting’ of protein fragments of known structure and appropriate length on to the flanking elements of secondary structure (Jones and Thirup, 1986; Fidelis et al., 1994).”
BackgroundKuznetsov, I. B., & Rackovsky, S. R. (2004) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.04833404 · Cited by 32
“Fragments of length five to six are also well represented in the PDB and cover most conformations accessible to a given fragment (Fidelis et al. 1994).”
BackgroundContreras‐Moreira, B., Fitzjohn, P. W., & Bates, P. A. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 32
Exhaustive docking of molecular fragments with electrostatic solvation
Majeux, N., Scarsi, M., Apostolakis, J., Ehrhardt, C., & Caflisch, A. (1999) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(19991001)37:1 · Cited by 175
Protein local structure prediction from sequence
Hunter, C. G., & Subramaniam, S. (2003) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10310 · Cited by 29
A Historical Perspective of Template-Based Protein Structure Prediction
Guo, J.-T., Ellrott, K., & Xu, Y. (2008) · Humana Press eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-574-9_1 · Cited by 28
Hvidsten, T. R., Kryshtafovych, A., Komorowski, J., & Fidelis, K. A. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth062 · Cited by 28
Self-citationMethods for Protein Homology Modelling
Pitman, M. R., & Menz, R. I. (2006) · Applied mycology and biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s1874-5334(06)80005-5 · Cited by 27
Full cyclic coordinate descent: solving the protein loop closure problem in Cα space
Boomsma, W., & Hamelryck, T. (2005) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-6-159 · Cited by 26
Computational challenges in structural and functional genomics
Head-Gordon, T. L., & Wooley, J. (2001) · IBM Systems Journal · doi:10.1147/sj.402.0265 · Cited by 26
Critical Features of Fragment Libraries for Protein Structure Prediction
Trevizani, R., Custódio, F. L., Santos, K. B., & Dardenne, L. E. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170131 · Cited by 24
Discrete restraint‐based protein modeling and the Cα‐trace problem
DePristo, M. A., de Bakker, P. I. W., Shetty, R. P., et al. (2003) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.0386903 · Cited by 23
“For knowledge-based methods, the coverage of fragments extracted from the database of proteins can be a source of model inaccuracy on unusual conformations, such as loops that exhibit substantial structural variability (Fidelis et al. 1994).”
MethodStructural Conservation in Single-Domain Proteins: Implications for Homology Modeling
D'Alfonso, G., Tramontano, A. L., & Lahm, A. (2001) · Journal of Structural Biology · doi:10.1006/jsbi.2001.4351 · Cited by 23
“There are also procedures that are the combination of both ( Fidelis et al., 1994; van Vlijmen and Karplus, 1997)”
BackgroundOptimization of solvation models for predicting the structure of surface loops in proteins
Das, B., & Meirovitch, H. (2001) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.1041 · Cited by 23
A quality metric for homology modeling: the H-factor
di Luccio, E., & Koehl, P. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-48 · Cited by 23
Das, B., & Meirovitch, H. (2003) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10356 · Cited by 22
Comparative protein structure modeling as an optimization problem
Sánchez, R., & Šali, A. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Structure THEOCHEM · doi:10.1016/s0166-1280(96)04971-8 · Cited by 22
Confronting the problem of interconnected structural changes in the comparative modeling of proteins
Samudrala, R., Pedersen, J. T., Zhou, H., et al. (1995) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340230307 · Cited by 22
Self-citationFernández‐Fuentes, N., Querol, E., Avilés, F. X., et al. (2005) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20516 · Cited by 21
“…of the fragment to be compared (there are different superposition methods described in the literature that can give different RMSD values 21 ); (2) selected atoms to calculate the final RMSD (i.e., main-chain atom only or main-chain plus side-chain atoms, etc.); and (3) design of the…”
BackgroundMethodInfluence of protein structure databases on the predictive power of statistical pair potentials
Furuichi, E., & Koehl, P. (1998) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(19980501)31:2 · Cited by 37
Janardhan, A. H., & Vajda, S. (1998) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.5560070812 · Cited by 21
Hvidsten, T. R., Kryshtafovych, A., & Fidelis, K. A. (2008) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22296 · Cited by 20
Self-citationBates, P. A., Dokurno, P., Freemont, P. S., & Sternberg, M. J. E. (1998) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1998.2210 · Cited by 20
Structure prediction for the helical skeletons detected from the low resolution protein density map
Nasr, K. A., Sun, W., & He, J. J. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-s1-s44 · Cited by 17
“Once the structure of the skeletons are predicted, loops can be added using our previous method [12][13] or other existing loop closure methods [14-20].”
MethodSiew, N., & Fischer, D. (2001) · IBM Systems Journal · doi:10.1147/sj.402.0410 · Cited by 17
Flexible protein–ligand docking by global energy optimization in internal coordinates
Totrov, M. M., & Abagyan, R. A. (1997) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(1997)1+ · Cited by 451
Designing succinct structural alphabets
Li, S. C., Bu, D., Gao, X. D., et al. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn165 · Cited by 16
Comparative Protein Structure Modeling
Fiser, A., Sánchez, R., Melo, F., & Fiser, A. (2001) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203903827.pt3 · Cited by 18
A Modular Perspective of Protein Structures: Application to Fragment Based Loop Modeling
Fernández‐Fuentes, N., & Fiser, A. (2012) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-065-6_9 · Cited by 13
“Similarly to the prediction of protein structures there are ab initio (conformational search) methods (40–42), and database search (or knowledge-based) methods (43–45).”
MethodNasr, K. A., & He, J. J. (2009) · International Journal of Data Mining and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1504/ijdmb.2009.026712 · Cited by 13
“These conformations are then refined to satisfy the anchors (Fidelis et al., 1994; Li et al., 1999; Vlijmen and Karplus, 1997; Wojcik et al., 1999).”
BackgroundComparative Modeling of Drug Target Proteins☆
Webb, B., Eswar, N., Fan, H., Khuri, N., Pieper, U., Dong, G., & Šali, A. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-409547-2.11133-3 · Cited by 12
Clinciu, D. L., Chen, Y., Ko, C.-N., Lo, C.-C., & Yang, J. (2010) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-s4-s26 · Cited by 13
“In addition, GEMDOCK has been successfully applied to identify inhibitors and binding sites for some targets [23-27].”
Exploring the conformational diversity of loops on conserved frameworks
Li, W., Liang, S., Wang, R., et al. (1999) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/12.12.1075 · Cited by 13
Computing Protein Structures from Electron Density Maps: The Missing Fragment Problem
Lotan, I., van den Bedem, H., Deacon, A. M., & Latombe, J. (2005) · Springer tracts in advanced robotics · doi:10.1007/10991541_24 · Cited by 12
“The applicability of this approach was initially limited to loops of length 4 [26], but later work suggested an upper limit of 9 [61].”
BackgroundAb initio construction of all-atom loop conformations
Jiang, H., & Blouin, C. (2005) · Journal of Molecular Modeling · doi:10.1007/s00894-005-0030-x · Cited by 12
Detecting local residue environment similarity for recognizing near‐native structure models
Kim, H., & Kihara, D. (2014) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24658 · Cited by 11
Computational Modeling of Protein Three-Dimensional Structure: Methods and Resources
Pan, A., Gnanasekar, P., & Chakraborty, S. S. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-822312-3.00023-0 · Cited by 13
Comparative Protein Structure Modelling
Fiser, A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-1069-3_4 · Cited by 11
Computational Biochemistry of Antibodies and T-Cell Receptors
Novotný, J., & Bajorath, J. (1996) · Advances in protein chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60490-8 · Cited by 10
Clustering and percolation in protein loop structures
Peng, X., He, J., & Niemi, A. J. (2015) · BMC Structural Biology · doi:10.1186/s12900-015-0049-x · Cited by 8
“The success in loop modelling is also often limited to super-secondary structures where α -helices and β -strands are connected to each other by relatively short twists and turns [16, 17].”
BackgroundModeling Protein Structure from its Sequence
Martı́-Renom, M. A., Madhusudhan, M. S., Eswar, N., Pieper, U., Shen, M., Šali, A., Fiser, A., Mirković, N., John, B., & Stuart, A. C. (2003) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/0471250953.bi0501s03 · Cited by 9
“Even according to the more optimistic estimate, ∼30% and 60% of all the possible 8 and 9 residue loop conformations, respectively, are missing from the database (Fidelis et al., 1994).”
BackgroundModeling Loops in Protein Structures
Fernández‐Fuentes, N., & Fiser, A. (2010) · doi:10.1002/9780470882207.ch13 · Cited by 8
3.13 Computational Methods Related to Molecular Structure and Reaction Chemistry of Biomaterials ☆
Farokhirad, S., Bradley, R. P., Sarkar, A., Shih, A., Telesco, S., Liu, Y., Venkatramani, R., Eckmann, D. M., AYYASWAMY, P. S., & Radhakrishnan, R. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-803581-8.10216-4 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Fidelis, K., Stern, P. S., Bacon, D., & Moult, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute (US)
- Venue
- "Protein Engineering, Design and Selection"
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 953-960
- ISSN
- 0269-2139 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-0126
- 1741-0134
- OpenAlex
- W1990698302
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Protein Engineering Design and Selection (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01lm005102-03, 5r01gm041034-10)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM41034)
- U.S. National Library of Medicine (LM05102)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
- Keywords
- protein structure comparison, conformational space, structure database, comparative protein modeling, root mean square error
- MeSH terms
- Computer Simulation, Models, Molecular, Peptide Fragments, Databases, Factual, Sequence Alignment, Protein Structure, Secondary
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review