Cited by 161Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

FREAD revisited: accurate loop structure prediction using a database search algorithm

Choi, Yoonjoo, Deane, Charlotte M.·2010·Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics

Abstract

Loops are the most variable regions of protein structure and are, in general, the least accurately predicted. Their prediction has been approached in two ways, ab initio and database search. In recent years, it has been thought that ab initio methods are more powerful. In light of the continued rapid expansion in the number of known protein structures, we have re-evaluated FREAD, a database search method and demonstrate that the power of database search methods may have been underestimated. We found that sequence similarity as quantified by environment specific substitution scores can be used to significantly improve prediction. In fact, FREAD performs appreciably better for an identifiable subset of loops (two thirds of shorter loops and half of the longer loops tested) than the ab initio methods of MODELLER, PLOP, and RAPPER. Within this subset, FREAD's predictive ability is length independent, in general, producing results within 2A RMSD, compared to an average of over 10A for loop length 20 for any of the other tested methods. We also benchmarked the prediction protocols on a set of 212 loops from the model structures in CASP 7 and 8. An extended version of FREAD is able to make predictions for 127 of these, it gives the best prediction of the methods tested in 61 of these cases. In examining FREAD's ability to predict in the model environment, we found that whole structure quality did not affect the quality of loop predictions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/prot.22658

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Choi, Y., & Deane, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Choi, Yoonjoo
Venue
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-12-23
Volume
78
Issue
6
Pages
1431-1440
ISSN
  • 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0134
OpenAlex
W2005140643
Cited by
161
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Oxford
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
database searching, sequence similarity, MODELLER, loop length, structural quality
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Models, Molecular, Proteins, Protein Structure, Secondary, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review