Exploring the interplay between experimental methods and the performance of predictors of binding affinity change upon mutations in protein complexes
Open accessAbstract
Reliable prediction of binding affinity changes (ΔΔG) upon mutations in protein complexes relies not only on the performance of computational methods but also on the availability and quality of experimental data. Binding affinity changes can be measured by various experimental methods with different accuracies and limitations. To understand the impact of these on the prediction of binding affinity change, we present the Database of binding Affinity Change Upon Mutation (DACUM), a database of 1872 binding affinity changes upon single-point mutations, a subset of the SKEMPI database (Moal,I.H. and Fernández-Recio,J. Bioinformatics, 2012;28:2600-2607) extended with information on the experimental methods used for ΔΔG measurements. The ΔΔG data were classified into different data sets based on the experimental method used and the position of the mutation (interface and non-interface). We tested the prediction performance of the original HADDOCK score, a newly trained version of it and mutation Cutoff Scanning Matrix (Pires,D.E.V., Ascher,D.B. and Blundell,T.L. Bioinformatics 2014;30:335-342), one of the best reported ΔΔG predictors so far, on these various data sets. Our results demonstrate a strong impact of the experimental methods on the performance of binding affinity change predictors for protein complexes. This underscores the importance of properly considering and carefully choosing experimental methods in the development of novel binding affinity change predictors. The DACUM database is available online at https://github.com/haddocking/DACUM.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Berman, H. M. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · Cited by 40,196 · see citing works
Jorgensen, W. L., & Tirado‐Rives, J. (1988) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00214a001 · Cited by 5,018 · see citing works
MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids
Davis, I., Leaver‐Fay, A., Chen, V. B., Block, J. N., Kapral, G. J., Wang, X., Murray, L. W., Arendall, W. B., Snoeyink, J. S., Richardson, J. S., et al. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm216 · Cited by 3,915 · see citing works
HADDOCK: A Protein−Protein Docking Approach Based on Biochemical or Biophysical Information
Dominguez, C., Boelens, R., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja026939x · Cited by 3,187 · see citing works
Self-citationThe HADDOCK2.2 Web Server: User-Friendly Integrative Modeling of Biomolecular Complexes
van Zundert, G. C. P., Rodrigues, J. P. G. L. M., Trellet, M., Schmitz, C., Kastritis, P. L., Karaca, E., Melquiond, A. S. J., van Dijk, M., de Vries, S. J., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2016) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2015.09.014 · Cited by 2,785 · see citing works
Self-citationmCSM: Predicting the effects of mutations in proteins using graph-based signatures
Pires, D. E. V., Ascher, D. B., & Blundell, T. L. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt691 · Cited by 1,066 · see citing works
Contacts-based prediction of binding affinity in protein–protein complexes
Vangone, A., & Bonvin, A. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.07454 · Cited by 563 · see citing works
Self-citationOn the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact
Kastritis, P. L., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2012) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2012.0835 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
Self-citationProtein−Protein Interactions: Interface Structure, Binding Thermodynamics, and Mutational Analysis
Stites, W. E. (1997) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr960387h · Cited by 491 · see citing works
BeAtMuSiC: prediction of changes in protein–protein binding affinity on mutations
Dehouck, Y., Kwasigroch, J. M., Rooman, M., & Gilis, D. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt450 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
A structure‐based benchmark for protein–protein binding affinity
Kastritis, P., Moal, I., Hwang, H., Weng, Z., Bates, P. A., Bonvin, A., & Janin, J. (2011) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.580 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Self-citationMoal, I. H., & Fernández-Recio, J. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts489 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Identification of Protein–Protein Interaction Sites from Docking Energy Landscapes
Fernández‐Recio, J., Totrov, M. M., & Abagyan, R. A. (2003) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2003.10.069 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
A simple definition of structural regions in proteins and its use in analyzing interface evolution
Levy, E. D. (2010) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2010.09.028 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Kastritis, P. L., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2010) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr9009854 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Self-citationLensink, M. F., Velankar, S. S., Kryshtafovych, A., Huang, S., Schneidman‐Duhovny, D., Šali, A., Segura, J., Fernández‐Fuentes, N., Viswanath, S., Elber, R., et al. (2016) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25007 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Self-citationBrender, J. R., & Zhang, Y. (2015) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004494 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Predicting the Impact of Missense Mutations on Protein–Protein Binding Affinity
Li, M., Petukh, M., Alexov, E., & Panchenko, A. R. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct401022c · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Berliner, N., Teyra, J., Çolak, R., Lopez, S. G., & Kim, P. M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107353 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Dourado, D. F. A. R., & Flores, S. C. (2014) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24634 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Moal, I. H., & Fernández‐Recio, J. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct400295z · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jankauskaitė, J., Jiménez-García, B., Dapkūnas, J., Fernández-Recio, J., & Moal, I. H. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty635 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Barlow, K. A., Conchúir, S. Ó., Thompson, S., Suresh, P., Lucas, J. E., Heinonen, M., & Kortemme, T. (2018) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b11367 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Protein–protein interactions: scoring schemes and binding affinity
Gromiha, M. M., Yugandhar, K., & Jemimah, S. (2016) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2016.10.016 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
SAAMBE-3D: Predicting Effect of Mutations on Protein–Protein Interactions
Pahari, S., Li, G., Murthy, A. K., Liang, S., Fragoza, R., Yu, H., & Alexov, E. G. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21072563 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Geng, C., Xue, L. C., Roel‐Touris, J., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2019) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1410 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Self-citationGeng, C., Vangone, A., Folkers, G. E., Xue, L. C., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2019) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25630 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationBorrman, T. M., Cimons, J. M., Cosiano, M., Purcaro, M. J., Pierce, B. G., Baker, B. M., & Weng, Z. (2017) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25260 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Recent advances in user-friendly computational tools to engineer protein function
Sequeiros-Borja, C. E., Surpeta, B., & Brezovský, J. (2020) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaa150 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Wee, J., & Xia, K. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac024 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
PPI-HotspotDB: Database of Protein–Protein Interaction Hot Spots
Chen, Y. C., Chen, Y., Wright, J. D., & Lim, C. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00025 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Sulea, T. I., Hussack, G., Ryan, S., Tanha, J., & Purisima, E. O. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-20599-4 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Free energy perturbation calculations of mutation effects on SARS-CoV-2 RBD::ACE2 binding affinity
Sergeeva, A. P., Katsamba, P. S., Liao, J., Sampson, J. M., Bahna, F., Mannepalli, S., Morano, N. C., Shapiro, L., Friesner, R. A., & Honig, B. (2023) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2023.168187 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Marcu, O., Dodson, E. J., Alam, N., Sperber, M., Kozakov, D., Lensink, M. F., & Schueler‐Furman, O. (2016) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25230 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Protein–Protein Interaction Interfaces and their Functional Implications
Schreiber, G. (2020) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · doi:10.1039/9781788016544-00001 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Liu, X., Feng, H., Wu, J., & Xia, K. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00580 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Rana, M. M., & Nguyen, D. D. (2023) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c02679 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Persistent Tor-algebra for protein–protein interaction analysis
Liu, X., Feng, H., Lü, Z., & Xia, K. (2023) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbad046 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Biomolecular Topology: Modelling and Analysis
Liu, J., Xia, K., Wu, J., Yau, S. S. ‐., & Wei, G. (2022) · Acta Mathematica Sinica English Series · doi:10.1007/s10114-022-2326-5 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Decoding the effects of mutation on protein interactions using machine learning
Wang, X., Li, A., Zhao, Y., & Peng, Y. (2025) · Biophysics Reviews · doi:10.1063/5.0249920 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Sorokina, M., Belapure, J., Tüting, C., Paschke, R., Papasotiriou, I., Rodrigues, J., & Kastritis, P. L. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167637 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Kumar, A. K., & Rathore, R. S. (2023) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2023.2252077 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Dominant negative variants and cotranslational assembly of macromolecular complexes
Veitia, R. A. (2023) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.202300105 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
González, M. G., Béquignon, O. J. M., Manners, E. J., Gaulton, A., Mutowo, P., Dawson, E., Zdrazil, B., Leach, A. R., IJzerman, A. P., Heitman, L. H., et al. (2024) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-kxlgm · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Leveraging Neural Networks to Correct FoldX Free Energy Estimates
Barnes, J. E., Chi, L. A., Pandey, S. K., Ytreberg, F. M., & Patel, J. S. (2026) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.6c01409 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Predicting interacting hotspots for nanobodies' binding using triplets of residues
Hamdani, R., Cianferoni, D., Reche, R., Delgado, J., & Serrano, L. G. (2025) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.70220 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Koşaca, M., Şamiloğlu, E., & Karaca, E. (2021) · International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences · doi:10.7240/jeps.920075
Kumar, A. K., & Rathore, R. S. (2022) · doi:10.22541/au.167101052.24746048/v1
- Authors
- Geng, C., Vangone, A., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Bonvin, Alexandre M.J.J.
- Venue
- Protein Engineering Design and Selection
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-06-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 291-299
- ISSN
- 0269-2139 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-0126
- 1741-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2412612592
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Protein Engineering Design and Selection (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission (675728, 659025)
- China Scholarship Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- protein complexes, point mutations, experimental measurement methods, protein-protein interaction
- MeSH terms
- Mutation, Protein Binding, Proteins, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review