The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digestive and Bacterial Enzyme Activities in Broilers Fed Diets Supplemented with Lactobacillus Cultures
Open accessAbstract
A study was carried out to investigate the effects of adherent Lactobacillus cultures on 1) amylolytic, lipolytic, and proteolytic enzyme activities in the contents of the small intestine (from the distal end of the duodenum to the ileocecal junction) and 2) bacterial beta-glucuronidase and beta-glucosidase activities in the intestinal contents and feces of broiler chickens. Three dietary treatments were randomly assigned to three groups of chicks, i.e., basal diet only (control group), basal diet + 0.1% dried culture of Lactobacillus acidophilus, and basal diet + 0.1% dried culture of a mixture of 12 Lactobacillus strains. The results showed that supplementation of the adherent Lactobacillus cultures to chickens, either as a single strain of L. acidophilus or as a mixture of 12 Lactobacillus strains, increased significantly (P < 0.05) the levels of amylase in the small intestine. However, the proteolytic and lipolytic activities in the small intestine were not affected by addition of either of the adherent Lactobacillus cultures. Addition of either L. acidophilus or a mixture of 12 Lactobacillus strains was also found to reduce significantly (P < 0.05) the intestinal and fecal beta-glucuronidase and fecal beta-glucosidase but not the intestinal beta-glucosidase at 40 d of feeding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effect of Diet and Lactobacillus acidophilus Supplements on Human Fecal Bacterial Enzymes23
Goldin, B. R., Swenson, L., Dwyer, J., Sexton, M., & Gorbach, S. L. (1980) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/64.2.255 · Cited by 286
Cited by
Awad, W. A., Ghareeb, K., Abdel-Raheem, S., & Böhm, J. (2009) · Poultry Science · doi:10.3382/ps.2008-00244 · Cited by 873
Mountzouris, K. C., Tsirtsikos, P., Kalamara, E., Nitsch, S., Schatzmayr, G., & Fegeros, K. (2007) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/86.2.309 · Cited by 632
Monostrain, multistrain and multispecies probiotics—A comparison of functionality and efficacy
Timmerman, H. M., Koning, C. J. M., Mulder, L., Rombouts, F. M., & Beynen, A. C. (2004) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.05.012 · Cited by 631
Mookiah, S., Sieo, C. C., Ramasamy, K., Abdullah, N., & Ho, Y. W. (2014) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.6365 · Cited by 273
Self-citationIdentification and Cloning of gusA , Encoding a New β-Glucuronidase from Lactobacillus gasseri ADH
Russell, W. M., & Klaenhammer, T. R. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.3.1253-1261.2001 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Jin, L. Z., Ho, Y. W., Abdullah, N., & Jalaludin, S.
- Venue
- Poultry Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 886-891
- ISSN
- 0032-5791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036043947
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digestive and Bacterial Enzyme Activities in Broilers Fed Diets Supplemented with Lactobacillus Cultures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ps/79.6.886
- The paper
- Jin, L. Z., Ho, Y. W., Abdullah, N., & Jalaludin, S. (2000). Digestive and Bacterial Enzyme Activities in Broilers Fed Diets Supplemented with Lactobacillus Cultures. Poultry Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.6.886
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.