Cited by 983Animal Nutrition and PhysiologyEssential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityAgricultural safety and regulations

Influence of two plant extracts on broilers performance, digestibility, and digestive organ size

Open access
Hernández, F., Madrid, J., García, V., Orengo, J., Megías, M.D.·2004·Poultry Science

Abstract

A 42-d trial was conducted to study the influence of 2 plant extracts on performance, digestibility, and digestive organ weights in broilers. The feeding program consisted of a starter diet until 21 d and a finisher diet until 42 d. There were 4 treatment groups: control; 10 ppm avilamycin (AB); 200 ppm essential oil extract (EOE) from oregano, cinnamon, and pepper; and 5,000 ppm Labiatae extract (LE) from sage, thyme, and rosemary. No differences in feed intake or feed conversion were observed. From 14 to 21 d of age, broilers fed the LE diet grew faster than the broilers fed the control or EOE feeds (68.8 vs. 63.9 and 61.6 g/d, respectively). Antibiotic and plant extract supplementation improved apparent whole-tract and ileal digestibility of the nutrients. For starter feed, LE supplementation improved apparent fecal digestibility of DM (P < 0.01), and all additives increased ether extract digestibility (P < 0.001). However, no effect was detected for CP digestibility (P > 0.1). At the ileal level, the AB, EOE, and LE supplementation of the starter feed increased DM and starch (P < 0.01) digestibility but not CP digestibility (P > 0.1). All additives improved apparent fecal digestibility of DM and CP of the finisher diet. No differences were observed for proventriculus, gizzard, liver, pancreas, or large or small intestine weight. In the present study, both plant extracts improved the digestibility of the feeds for broilers. The effect of different additives on digestibility improved the performance slightly, but this effect was not statistically significant.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ps/83.2.169

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The antibacterial activity of cinnamaldehyde, eugenol and carvacrol was observed due to their preventive effects on pathogen microorganisms.

    “The antibacterial activity of cinnamaldehyde, eugenol and carvacrol was observed due to their preventive effects on pathogen microorganisms [49].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hernández, F., Madrid, J., García, V., Orengo, J., & Megías, M. D.
Affiliations
Universidad de Murcia (ES)
Corresponding author
Hernández, F.
Venue
Poultry Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-02
Volume
83
Issue
2
Pages
169-174
ISSN
0032-5791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123900333
Cited by
983
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 50
FWCI
22.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Poultry Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
Keywords
plant extracts, broiler chickens, avilamycin, essential oil extracts, oregano, cinnamon, pepper, sage, thyme, Rosmarinus officinalis, antibiotic alternatives, growth performance, nutrient digestibility, ileal digestibility, faecal digestibility, digestive organ weight, starter diets, finisher diets
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Energy Intake, Chickens, Dietary Proteins, Digestion, Digestive System, Growth Substances, Ileum, Male, Oils, Volatile, Oligosaccharides, Organ Size, Plant Extracts, Random Allocation, Lamiaceae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review