The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Normative Values for Isometric Muscle Force Measurements Obtained With Hand-held Dynamometers
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The extent of a patient's impairment can be established by comparing measurements of that patient's performance with normative values obtained from apparently unimpaired individuals. Only a few studies have described normative values for muscle strength measured by hand-held dynamometry. The purpose of this study of older adults, therefore, was to obtain normative values of maximum voluntary isometric force using hand-held dynamometers. SUBJECTS: One hundred fifty-six asymptomatic adults (77 men, 70 women) participated in this study. The subjects' mean age was 64.4 years (SD=8.3, range=50-79). The male subjects' mean age was 64.5 years (SD=8.4, range=50-79), and the female subjects' mean age was 64.3 years (SD=8.2, range=50-79). METHODS: Gender, age, dominant side, height, weight, and activity level were recorded. Eight upper-extremity movements (shoulder flexion, extension, abduction, and medial and lateral rotation; elbow flexion and extension; and wrist extension) and five lower-extremity movements (hip flexion and abduction, knee flexion and extension, and ankle dorsiflexion) were resisted by one of three experienced testers using a strain-gauge hand-held dynamometer. RESULTS: Gender, age, and weight were identified as independent predictors of force for all muscle actions on both the dominant and nondominant sides. These variables were used, therefore, to create regression equations and normative values for the force of each muscle action. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The reference values provided may allow clinicians who follow the described testing protocol to estimate the severity of force-generating impairments in patients aged 50 to 79 years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lum, P. S., Burgar, C. G., Shor, P. C., Majmundar, M., & Van der Loos, M. (2002) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.33101 · Cited by 1,159
Muscle weakness and falls in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Moreland, J. D., Richardson, J. A., Goldsmith, C. H., & Clase, C. M. (2004) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52310.x · Cited by 988
Upper Extremity Use in People with Hemiparesis in the First Few Weeks After Stroke
Lang, C. E., Wagner, J. M., Edwards, D. F., & Dromerick, A. W. (2007) · Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy · doi:10.1097/npt.0b013e31806748bd · Cited by 216
Maximal Isometric Muscle Strength: Normative Values and Gender-Specific Relation to Age
Stoll, T., Huber, E., Seifert, B., Michel, B. A., & Stucki, G. (2000) · Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1007/s100670050026 · Cited by 141
Protein and amino acid requirements in the elderly
Kurpad, A., & Vaz, M. (2000) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601035 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Andrews, A. W., Thomas, M. W., & Bohannon, R. W.
- Venue
- Physical Therapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-03-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 248-259
- ISSN
- 0031-9023 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-6724
- OpenAlex
- W2197311367
- Cited by
- 705
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Normative Values for Isometric Muscle Force Measurements Obtained With Hand-held Dynamometers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ptj/76.3.248
- The paper
- Andrews, A. W., Thomas, M. W., & Bohannon, R. W. (1996). Normative Values for Isometric Muscle Force Measurements Obtained With Hand-held Dynamometers. Physical Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/76.3.248
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.