Cited by 70Muscle metabolism and nutritionNutrition and Health in AgingClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology

Protein and amino acid requirements in the elderly

Kurpad, AV, Vaz, M·2000·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Estimates of protein and amino acid requirements in this paper are proposed for healthy elderly people. The estimate of protein requirement was based on nitrogen (N) balance, as well as functional indicators such as immune function or muscle strength. Data suggest that the protein requirement for nitrogen equilibrium in the elderly, is greater than 0.8 gm/kg body weight/day. There do not appear to be any adverse consequences with protein intakes that are about 1 gm/kg body weight/day. The tentative recommendation in this paper is higher than the current mean recommended intake of protein (FAO/WHO/UNU, 1985). However, because of methodological difficulties, the data does not allow for a confident prediction of what the exact level of protein intake should be. Further studies are needed to come to a firm conclusion on the exact protein requirement. Indispensable amino acid requirements based on nitrogen balance data, in the elderly, are fragmentary and conflicting. These requirements can alternatively be based on obligatory nitrogen loss, for which data is available in the elderly. The overlap of the obligatory nitrogen loss between the young and the elderly, suggest that the amino acid requirement based on this technique is similar in young and elderly individuals. Tracer based techniques measuring amino acid balance at different amino acid intakes, also support the view that there are no differences in the amino acid requirements between young and elderly people. In general, these amino acid requirement studies have been performed in healthy USA subjects, and data is needed to know if these estimates can be extended to populations from other, less-developed countries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601035

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kurpad, A., & Vaz, M.
Affiliations
St.John's Medical College Hospital (IN)
ORCID
Vaz, M
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2000-06-01
Volume
54
Issue
S3
Pages
S131-S142
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W1992023478
Cited by
70
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Keywords
protein requirements, amino acid requirements, older adults, nitrogen balance, immune function, muscle strength, RDA, essential amino acids
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Amino Acids, Dietary Proteins, Health Status, Humans, Nitrogen, Nutritional Requirements, Proteins, Nutrition Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review