The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Relationship Between Lumbar Spine Load and Muscle Activity During Extensor Exercises
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There have been no previous studies that quantitatively assessed the load on the spine during extensor exercises. The purpose of our study was to investigate the loading of the lumbar spine and trunk muscle activity levels while subjects performed typical trunk extensor exercises. SUBJECTS: Thirteen male volunteers (mean age = 21.0 years, SD = 1.0, range = 19-23; mean height = 176.0 cm, SD = 6.2, range = 165-188; mean mass = 77.0 kg, SD = 7.0, range = 63-89) participated. METHODS: The subjects performed four different back exercises. Electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded from 14 trunk muscles. The postures that corresponded to the maximum external moment were identified and quantified using rigid body modeling combined with an EMG-driven model to determine joint loading at the L4-5 joint. The exercises were then evaluated based on the lumbar spine loading and peak muscle activity levels. A reference task of lifting 10 kg from midthigh was included for comparison. RESULTS: The exercises involving active trunk extension produced the highest joint forces and muscle activity levels. Exercises involving leg extension with the spine held isometrically demonstrated asymmetrical activity of the trunk muscles, thereby reducing loads on the spine. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The back extensor exercises examined provided a wide range of joint loading and muscle activity levels. Single-leg extension tasks appear to constitute a low-risk exercise for initial extensor strengthening, given the low spine load and mild extensor muscle challenge. When combined with contralateral arm extensions, the challenge and demand of the exercise were increased. The compressive loading and extensor muscle activity levels were highest for the trunk extension exercises.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kumar, M., Baklanov, A., & Chopin, D. (2001) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s005860000239 · Cited by 675
Electromyographic Analysis of Core Trunk, Hip, and Thigh Muscles During 9 Rehabilitation Exercises
Ekstrom, R. A., Donatelli, R. A., & Carp, K. C. (2007) · Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2007.2471 · Cited by 594
A Guide for Use and Interpretation of Kinesiologic Electromyographic Data
Soderberg, G. L., & Knutson, L. M. (2000) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/80.5.485 · Cited by 538
Low Back Exercises: Evidence for Improving Exercise Regimens
McGill, S. M. (1998) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/78.7.754 · Cited by 353
Self-citationCore Training: Evidence Translating to Better Performance and Injury Prevention
McGill, S. (2010) · Strength & Conditioning Journal · doi:10.1519/ssc.0b013e3181df4521 · Cited by 324
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Callaghan, J. P., Gunning, J. L., & McGill, S. M.
- Venue
- Physical Therapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 8-18
- ISSN
- 0031-9023 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-6724
- OpenAlex
- W2153406960
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Relationship Between Lumbar Spine Load and Muscle Activity During Extensor Exercises. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ptj/78.1.8
- The paper
- Callaghan, J. P., Gunning, J. L., & McGill, S. M. (1998). The Relationship Between Lumbar Spine Load and Muscle Activity During Extensor Exercises. Physical Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/78.1.8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.