The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physical Therapists' Perceptions of Factors Influencing the Acquisition of Motor Abilities of Children With Cerebral Palsy: Implications for Clinical Reasoning
Abstract
Background and Purpose. Evidence supporting factors predicting motor change for children with cerebral palsy is minimal. A consensus exercise using focus groups and survey methods was conducted to identify factors perceived to affect the acquisition of basic motor abilities among children with cerebral palsy from the time of diagnosis to 7 years of age. Subjects. Fifty-seven physical therapists participated in one of 12 focus groups, and 60 physical therapists participated in a follow-up questionnaire survey via mail. Methods. The nominal group technique was used to conduct the focus groups. Results. Participants reached consensus about 12 factors in 4 constructs, which we called: (1) primary impairments (muscle tone/movement patterns, distribution of involvement, balance, and sensory impairment), (2) secondary impairments (range of motion/joint alignment, force production, health, and endurance), (3) personality characteristics (motivation), and (4) family factors (support to child, family expectations, and support to family). Discussion and Conclusion. The recognition of potential determinants of motor change could assist in the clinical reasoning that physical therapists use when planning interventions for children with cerebral palsy. Participants identified a set of variables, some of which are found in the literature, that can provide foundation knowledge for decision making and research on factors that bring about change in motor ability among children with cerebral palsy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nashner, L. M., Shumway-Cook, A., & Marin, O. (1983) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00238781 · Cited by 396
Expert: a discussion of the implications of the concept as used in nursing
Jasper, M. A. (1994) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20040769.x · Cited by 265
Cited by
Rosenbaum, P., & Stewart, D. (2004) · Seminars in Pediatric Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.spen.2004.01.002 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Bartlett, D. J., & Palisano, R. J.
- Venue
- Physical Therapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-03-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 237-248
- ISSN
- 0031-9023 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-6724
- OpenAlex
- W2155007146
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physical Therapists' Perceptions of Factors Influencing the Acquisition of Motor Abilities of Children With Cerebral Palsy: Implications for Clinical Reasoning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ptj/82.3.237
- The paper
- Bartlett, D. J., & Palisano, R. J. (2002). Physical Therapists' Perceptions of Factors Influencing the Acquisition of Motor Abilities of Children With Cerebral Palsy: Implications for Clinical Reasoning. Physical Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/82.3.237
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.