The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Balance Disability After Stroke
Abstract
Background and Purpose. Balance disability is common after stroke, but there is little detailed information about it. The aims of this study were to investigate the frequency of balance disability; to characterize different levels of disability; and to identify demographics, stroke pathology factors, and impairments associated with balance disability. Subjects. The subjects studied were 75 people with a first-time anterior circulation stroke; 37 subjects were men, the mean age was 71.5 years (SD=12.2), and 46 subjects (61%) had left hemiplegia. Methods. Prospective hospital-based cross-sectional surveys were carried out in 2 British National Health Service trusts. The subjects’ stroke pathology, demographics, balance disability, function, and neurologic impairments were recorded in a single testing session 2 to 4 weeks after stroke. Results. A total of 83% of the subjects (n=62) had a balance disability; of these, 17 (27%) could sit but not stand, 25 (40%) could stand but not step, and 20 (33%) could step and walk but still had limited balance. Subjects with the most severe balance disability had more severe strokes, impairments, and disabilities. Weakness and sensation were associated with balance disability. Subject demographics, stroke pathology, and visuospatial neglect were not associated with balance disability. Discussion and Conclusion. Subjects with the most severe balance disability had the most severe strokes, impairments, and disabilities. Subject demographics, stroke pathology, and visuospatial neglect were not associated with balance disability. [Tyson SF, Hanley M, Chillala J, et al. Balance disability after stroke. Phys Ther. 2006;86:30–38.]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Functional Reach: A New Clinical Measure of Balance
Duncan, P. W., Weiner, D. K., Chandler, J., & Studenski, S. (1990) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/45.6.m192 · Cited by 2,873
The Barthel ADL Index: A reliability study
Collin, C., Wade, D. T., Davies, S., & Horne, V. (1988) · International Disability Studies · doi:10.3109/09638288809164103 · Cited by 2,734
Cerebral Vascular Accidents in Patients over the Age of 60: II. Prognosis
Rankin, J. (1957) · Scottish Medical Journal · doi:10.1177/003693305700200504 · Cited by 2,506
The Balance Scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke
Berg, K., Wood-Dauphinee, S., & Williams, J. (1995) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/1650197719952736 · Cited by 1,639
Motor Control: Theory and Practical Applications
Shumway‐Cook, A., & Woollacott, M. H. (1995) · Cited by 1,494
Motor Control: Theory and practical applications
Lennon, S. (1996) · Physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/s0031-9406(05)66312-2 · Cited by 1,205
Pandyan, A. D., Johnson, G. R., Price, C. I. M., Curless, R. H., Barnes, M. P., & Rodgers, H. (1999) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1191/026921599677595404 · Cited by 833
Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study.
Collin, C., & Wade, D. (1990) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.53.7.576 · Cited by 825
Motor Evaluation in Vascular Hemiplegia
Demeurisse, G., Demol, O., & Robaye, E. (1980) · European Neurology · doi:10.1159/000115178 · Cited by 811
The Rivermead Mobility Index: A further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment
Collen, F. M., Wade, D. T., Robb, G. F., & Bradshaw, C. M. (1991) · International Disability Studies · doi:10.3109/03790799109166684 · Cited by 780
Cited by
Post-stroke depression: A 2020 updated review
Medeiros, G. C., Roy, D., Kontos, N., & Beach, S. R. (2020) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.06.011 · Cited by 587
5-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test in Subjects With Chronic Stroke: Reliability and Validity
Mong, Y., Teo, T. W., & Ng, S. S. (2010) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.030 · Cited by 346
Flynn, S., Palma, P., & Bender, A. (2007) · Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy · doi:10.1097/npt.0b013e31815d00d5 · Cited by 335
Tyson, S. F., Hanley, M., Chillala, J., Selley, A. B., & Tallis, R. C. (2008) · Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair · doi:10.1177/1545968307305523 · Cited by 288
Self-citationSibley, K. M., Beauchamp, M. K., Van Ooteghem, K., Straus, S. E., & Jaglal, S. B. (2015) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.06.021 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Tyson, S. F., Hanley, M., Chillala, J., Selley, A., & Tallis, R. C.
- Venue
- Physical Therapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 30-38
- ISSN
- 0031-9023 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-6724
- OpenAlex
- W2157496228
- Cited by
- 592
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 8.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Balance Disability After Stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ptj/86.1.30
- The paper
- Tyson, S. F., Hanley, M., Chillala, J., Selley, A., & Tallis, R. C. (2006). Balance Disability After Stroke. Physical Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/86.1.30
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.