Cited by 215Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMedical Practices and RehabilitationStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in physical therapist practice: An umbrella and mapping review with meta-meta-analysis

Open access
Suso-Martí, Luis, La Touche, Roy, Herranz-Gómez, Aida, Angulo-Díaz-Parreño, Santiago, Paris-Alemany, Alba, Cuenca-Martínez, Ferran·2021·Physical Therapy

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Telerehabilitation is an option that should be adapted as soon as possible to face the crisis caused by coronavirus disease 2019. An umbrella and mapping review with meta-meta-analysis (MMA) of the available scientific evidence was performed to determine whether telerehabilitation could be an effective alternative to conventional rehabilitation in physical therapist practice. METHODS: A systematic review of reviews and a synthesis of the findings of all systematic evidence published to date with a visual map and a meta-meta-analysis (MMA) were performed. A systematic search was realized in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE (PubMed), and Google Scholar. Two independent reviewers performed a data analysis and assessed the quality of the included reviews, assessing the risk of bias using ROBIS. RESULTS: Twenty-nine articles that met the inclusion criteria were selected and divided according to the type of patient targeted for rehabilitation (patients with cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neurological conditions). The MMA regarding physical function between telerehabilitation and usual care rehabilitation did not reveal a statistically significant difference for patients with cardiorespiratory and musculoskeletal conditions. For patients with neurological conditions, the MMA revealed a statistically significant but negligible effect size in 6 reviews in favor of telerehabilitation (standardized mean difference = 0.18; 95% CI = 0.03-0.34). CONCLUSION: The results of the present review showed that telerehabilitation offers positive clinical results, even comparable to conventional face-to-face rehabilitation approaches. IMPACT: The advantages of lower cost and less interference by the rehabilitation processes in patients' daily life could justify implementing telerehabilitation in clinical settings in the coronavirus disease 2019 era.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ptj/pzab075

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Suso-Martí et al. showed no statistically significant differences between in-person physical therapy treatment and its delivery via telerehabilitation for various chronic conditions.

    “Suso-Martí et al. [8] showed that there were no statistically significant differences between in-person physical therapy treatment and its delivery via telerehabilitation for various chronic conditions.”

    From Behavior Modification Techniques on Patients with Chronic Pain in the Context of COVID-19 Telerehabilitation: An Umbrella Review (2022) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Musculoskeletal and Cardiorespiratory Telerehabilitation sections report no statistically significant difference in their analyses of physical function. The Discussion limits the comparison to physical function, describes cardiac and respiratory evidence as unclear, and reports statistically significant results favoring telerehabilitation for neurological disorders. The claim therefore overgeneralizes the finding to treatment across various chronic conditions. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0[M]. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suso-Martí, L., La Touche, R., Herranz-Gómez, A., Angulo-Díaz-Parreño, S., Paris-Alemany, A., & Cuenca-Martínez, F.
Affiliations
  • Motion in Brains Research Group , Instituto de Neurociencias y Ciencias del Movimiento (INCIMOV), , Spain
  • Facultad de Medicina, Universidad CEU San Pablo , Madrid, Spain
Venue
Physical Therapy
Published
2021-02-22
Volume
101
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 0031-9023 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-6724
OpenAlex
W3130683817
Cited by
215
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 10
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CEU Repositorio Institucional (Fundación Universitaria San Pablo CEU) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Repository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
De La Salle University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
telerehabilitation, COVID-19 pandemic, physical function, cardiorespiratory conditions, musculoskeletal disorders, neurological disorders, meta-meta-analysis, umbrella review, telemedicine
MeSH terms
Telerehabilitation, Cardiac Rehabilitation, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Nervous System Diseases, Review Literature as Topic, Physical Therapy Modalities, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review