Cited by 203Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Telehealthcare in COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis on physical outcomes and dyspnea.

Open access
Lundell, Sara, Holmner, Åsa, Rehn, Börje, Nyberg, Andre, Wadell, Karin·2015·Respiratory Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND Only a minority of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have access to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Home-based solutions such as telehealthcare, have been used in efforts to make PR more available. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the effects of telehealthcare on physical activity level, physical capacity and dyspnea in patients with COPD, and to describe the interventions used. METHODS Randomized controlled trials were identified through database searches, reference lists and included authors. Articles were reviewed based on eligibility criteria by three authors. Risk of bias was assessed by two authors. Standardized mean differences (SMD) or mean differences (MD) with 95% CI were calculated. Forest plots were used to present data visually. RESULTS Nine studies (982 patients) were included. For physical activity level, there was a significant effect favoring telehealthcare (MD, 64.7 min; 95% CI, 54.4-74.9). No difference between groups was found for physical capacity (MD, -1.3 m; 95% CI, -8.1-5.5) and dyspnea (SMD, 0.088; 95% CI, -0.056-0.233). Telehealthcare was promoted through phone calls, websites or mobile phones, often combined with education and/or exercise training. Comparators were ordinary care, exercise training and/or education. CONCLUSIONS The use of telehealthcare may lead to improvements in physical activity level, although the results should be interpreted with caution given the heterogeneity in studies. This is an important area of research and further studies of the effect of telehealthcare for patients with COPD would be beneficial. REGISTRATION In PROSPERO 2012: CRD42012003294. STUDY PROTOCOL http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPEROFILES/3294_PROTOCOL_20121016.pdf.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.10.008

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]4. Wehrmeister FC, Knorst M, Jardim JR, et al. Pulmonary rehabilitation programs for patients with copd. J Bras Pneu- mol 2011;37:544e55.
  2. [12]12. Wadell K, Janaudis Ferreira T, Arne M, Lisspers K, Stallberg B, Emtner M. Hospital-based pulmonary rehabili- tation in patients with COPD in Swedenea national survey. Respir Med 2013;107:1195e200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.rmed.2013.04.019.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lundell, S., Holmner, Å., Rehn, B., Nyberg, A., & Wadell, K.
Affiliations
Umeå University (SE)
Corresponding author
Lundell, Sara
Venue
Respiratory Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
109
Issue
1
Pages
11-26
ISSN
0954-6111 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074815806
Cited by
203
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 6
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Respiratory Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Riksförbundet HjärtLung
  • Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
telemedicine, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary rehabilitation, home-based rehabilitation, physical activity, physical capacity, dyspnea, exercise training, patient education, telephone-delivered intervention, mobile health
MeSH terms
Telerehabilitation, Dyspnea, Humans, Motor Activity, Treatment Outcome, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review