Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chronic Fatigue and Postexertional Malaise in People Living With Long COVID: An Observational Study

Open access
Twomey, Rosie, DeMars, Jessica, Franklin, Kelli, Culos-Reed, S Nicole, Weatherald, Jason, Wrightson, James G·2022·Physical Therapy

Abstract

Objective: People living with long COVID describe a high symptom burden, and a more detailed assessment is needed to inform rehabilitation recommendations. The objectives were to use validated questionnaires to measure the severity of fatigue and compare this with normative data and thresholds for clinical relevance in other diseases; measure and describe the impact of postexertional malaise (PEM); and assess symptoms of dysfunctional breathing, self-reported physical activity, and health-related quality of life. Methods: This was an observational study with a cross-sectional survey design (data collection from February 2021 to April 2021). Eligible participants were adults experiencing persistent symptoms due to COVID-19 that did not predate the confirmed or suspected infection. Questionnaires included the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue Scale and the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire–Post-Exertional Malaise. Results: After data cleaning, 213 participants were included in the analysis. The total Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue Scale score was 18 (SD = 10) (where the score can range from 0 to 52, and a lower score indicates more severe fatigue), and 71.4% were experiencing chronic fatigue. Postexertional symptom exacerbation affected most participants, and 58.7% met the PEM scoring thresholds used in people living with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Conclusion: Long COVID is characterized by chronic fatigue that is clinically relevant and at least as severe as fatigue in several other clinical conditions. PEM is a significant challenge for this patient group. Because of the potential for setbacks and deteriorated function following overexertion, fatigue and postexertional symptom exacerbation must be monitored and reported in clinical practice and in studies involving interventions for people with long COVID. Impact: Physical therapists working with people with long COVID should measure and validate the patient’s experience. Postexertional symptom exacerbation must be considered, and rehabilitation needs to be carefully designed based on individual presentation. Beneficial interventions might first ensure symptom stabilization via pacing, a self-management strategy for the activity that helps minimize postexertional malaise.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ptj/pzac005

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 81 references

Cited by

See all 308

Metadata

Authors
Twomey, R., DeMars, J., Franklin, K., Culos-Reed, S. N., Weatherald, J., & Wrightson, J. G.
Venue
Physical Therapy
Published
2022-01-13
Volume
102
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0031-9023 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-6724
OpenAlex
W4205536614
Cited by
308
References
81
FWCI
30.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chronic Fatigue and Postexertional Malaise in People Living With Long COVID: An Observational Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ptj/pzac005
The paper
Twomey, R., DeMars, J., Franklin, K., Culos-Reed, S. N., Weatherald, J., & Wrightson, J. G. (2022). Chronic Fatigue and Postexertional Malaise in People Living With Long COVID: An Observational Study. Physical Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzac005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.