The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Hunter Serotonin Toxicity Criteria: simple and accurate diagnostic decision rules for serotonin toxicity
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are difficulties with the diagnosis of serotonin toxicity, particularly with the use of Sternbach's criteria. AIM: To improve the criteria for diagnosing clinically significant serotonin toxicity. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data METHODS: We studied all patients admitted to the Hunter Area Toxicology Service (HATS) following an overdose of a serotonergic drug from January 1987 to November 2002 (n = 2222). Main outcomes were: diagnosis of serotonin toxicity by a clinical toxicologist, fulfillment of Sternbach's criteria and treatment with a serotonin receptor (5-HT(2A)) antagonist. A learning dataset of 473 selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)-alone overdoses was used to determine individual clinical features predictive of serotonin toxicity by univariate analysis. Decision rules using CART analysis were developed, and tested on the dataset of all serotonergic overdose admissions. RESULTS: Numerous clinical features were associated with serotonin toxicity, but only clonus (inducible, spontaneous or ocular), agitation, diaphoresis, tremor and hyperreflexia were needed for accurate prediction of serotonin toxicity as diagnosed by a clinical toxicologist. Although the learning dataset did not include patients with life-threatening serotonin toxicity, hypertonicity and maximum temperature > 38 degrees C were universal in such patients; these features were therefore added. Using these seven clinical features, decision rules (the Hunter Serotonin Toxicity Criteria) were developed. These new criteria were simpler, more sensitive (84% vs. 75%) and more specific (97% vs. 96%) than Sternbach's criteria. DISCUSSION: These redefined criteria for serotonin toxicity should be more sensitive to serotonin toxicity and less likely to yield false positives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Boyer, E. W., & Shannon, M. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra041867 · Cited by 1,821
MOHAMMAD‐ZADEH, L. F., MOSES, L., & GWALTNEY‐BRANT, S. M. (2008) · Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2885.2008.00944.x · Cited by 522
Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome: A Review from a Clinically Oriented Perspective
Tse, L., Barr, A., Scarapicchia, V., & Vila-Rodriguez, F. (2015) · Current Neuropharmacology · doi:10.2174/1570159x13999150424113345 · Cited by 179
Serotonin toxicity of serotonergic psychedelics
Malcolm, B., & Thomas, K. (2022) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-021-05876-x · Cited by 138
The anaesthetist, opioid analgesic drugs, and serotonin toxicity: A mechanistic and clinical review
Baldo, B. A., & Rose, M. A. (2020) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.010 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunkley, E. J. C., Isbister, G. K., Sibbritt, D., Dawson, A. H., & Whyte, I. M.
- Venue
- QJM
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-08-18
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 635-642
- ISSN
- 0033-5622 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2725
- 1460-2393
- OpenAlex
- W2048272107
- Cited by
- 1,029
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Hunter Serotonin Toxicity Criteria: simple and accurate diagnostic decision rules for serotonin toxicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/qjmed/hcg109
- The paper
- Dunkley, E. J. C., Isbister, G. K., Sibbritt, D., Dawson, A. H., & Whyte, I. M. (2003). The Hunter Serotonin Toxicity Criteria: simple and accurate diagnostic decision rules for serotonin toxicity. QJM. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcg109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.