Cited by 217Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

Risk factors for anticoagulation-related bleeding complications in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review

Hughes, M., Lip, G.Y.H., on behalf of the Guideline Development Group for the NICE national clinical guideline for management of atrial fibrillation in primary and secondary care·2007·QJM

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased stroke risk that may be reduced by therapeutic anticoagulation. However, anticoagulation is associated with an increased risk of bleeding that in some patients may outweigh the benefits in reducing the risk of stroke. We systematically reviewed the literature for risk factors of anticoagulation-related bleeding complications in patients with AF, as part of the formulation of recently published national guidelines for the management of AF. We identified nine studies that reported anticoagulation-related bleeding complications in AF patients. The following patient characteristics were identified as having supporting evidence for being risk factors for anticoagulation-related bleeding complications: advanced age, uncontrolled hypertension, history of myocardial infarction or ischaemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, anaemia or a history of bleeding, and the concomitant use of other drugs such as antiplatelet agents. The presence of diabetes mellitus, controlled hypertension and gender were not identified as significant risk factors. Some of the risk factors for anticoagulation-related bleeding are also indications for the use of anticoagulants in AF patients. There is a need for further research in this area to help physicians to balance the risks and benefits of anticoagulation in AF patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/qjmed/hcm076

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hughes, M., Lip, G. Y. H., & on behalf of the Guideline Development Group for the NICE national clinical guideline for management of atrial fibrillation in primary and secondary care
Affiliations
  • Royal College of Physicians (GB)
  • Birmingham City Hospital (GB)
Venue
QJM
Published
2007-09-19
Volume
100
Issue
10
Pages
599-607
ISSN
  • 0033-5622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2725
  • 1460-2393
OpenAlex
W2128635858
Cited by
217
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 28
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • QJM (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, anticoagulation, bleeding complications, risk factors, stroke prevention, antiplatelet agents, hypertension, myocardial infarction, anemia, old age, concomitant drug use, benefits and risks
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Anticoagulants, Atrial Fibrillation, Female, Hemorrhage, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review