Cited by 11Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersRheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

Successful use of adalimumab in immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated inflammatory arthritis

Open access
Oke, Anuoluwapo R, Wheater, Matthew, Karydis, Ioannis, Wallis, Dinny·2018·Rheumatology Advances in Practice

Abstract

Immune checkpoints are pathways that regulate the immune response in order to maintain self-tolerance and prevent autoimmunity. Examples of such pathways are those regulated by cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) and programmed death 1 (PD1). CTLA4 is a molecule expressed by activated T cells and counteracts the T-cell co-stimulatory receptor CD28, thereby inhibiting T-cell activation. PD1 is expressed on T cells and inhibits kinases that are involved in T-cell activation in the presence of its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. Tumour cells can use these inhibitory mechanisms to evade T-cell-mediated elimination. Checkpoint blockade by monoclonal antibodies enhances the cell-mediated response against tumour cells, and immunotherapy has proved a successful treatment option for a range of cancers. However, these therapies are associated with a wide spectrum of side effects, known as immune-related adverse events (IRAEs), thought to arise from general immunological enhancement. Limited data are available to guide the treatment of IRAEs. We present a case of inflammatory arthritis following treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) ipilimumab (anti-CTLA4) and pembrolizumab (anti-PD1) in a patient with malignant melanoma. A 52-year-old female underwent excision of left leg stage 2A malignant melanoma in 2009. She re-presented in 2013 with recurrence in the inguinal lymph nodes, which were resected (V600E BRAF mutation positive). She entered the active arm of a placebo-controlled trial of adjuvant B-Raf protein/mitogen-activated protein kinase (BRAF/MEK) inhibitor therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib for 1 year, completed in 2015. In August 2015, imaging revealed metastatic spread to the liver. Four doses of ipilimumab were given during September–November 2015, but because of disease progression she switched to pembrolizumab in December 2015. While on ipilimumab, she reported intermittent arthralgia, which responded to NSAIDs. After the second dose of pembrolizumab, she developed a polyarthritis [Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCEA) grade 2] requiring treatment with prednisolone 60 mg daily. Symptoms persisted while tapering the prednisolone. She continued on prednisolone 10 mg daily, with prophylactic increases to 20 mg on days 3 and 4 after each infusion of pembrolizumab. In July 2016, imaging demonstrated enlargement of porta hepatis lymph nodes. She was switched back to combination therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib. Two weeks later, she developed a polyarthritis affecting the hands, wrists, knees and ankles. Prednisolone was increased to 60 mg daily with no effect, and she was referred to rheumatology. Examination revealed synovitis of multiple PIP joints and MTP joints, knee effusions and tenosynovitis of the wrists. No erosions were seen on hand and foot radiographs. CRP was elevated (128 mg/l). RF, ANA, ANCA, anti-CCP, thyroid function, hepatitis serology, HIV serology and QuantiFERON were normal or negative. MTX 15 mg weekly was initiated, but after 8 weeks the arthritis persisted, with 23 tender joints, 16 swollen joints, CRP 82 mg/l (DAS28-CRP 7.36). Wrist injection was performed, MTX increased to 25 mg weekly and prednisolone increased to 30 mg daily, leading to some improvement (DAS28-CRP 5.78). In January 2017, the arthritis became more active (DAS28-CRP 6.54) despite MTX 25 mg weekly and prednisolone 10 mg. She commenced adalimumab 40 mg every fortnight in February 2017 and switched to s.c. MTX. She was able to discontinue prednisolone in April 2017. The patient reported an excellent response to adalimumab, with no tender or swollen joints in June and July 2017. In August 2017, small knee effusions were noted (CTCEA grade 1), and MTX was reintroduced. In September 2017, 8 months after starting adalimumab, DAS28-CRP was 4.39 and restaging CT demonstrated overall stable disease, but imaging in November 2017 demonstrated enlarging porta hepatis lymph nodes, and the patient chose to stop adalimumab. BRAF inhibitors are recognized to cause arthralgia, which is usually manageable with NSAIDs and temporary suspension of the drug. To our knowledge, there are no reports of a persistent inflammatory arthritis associated with BRAF/MEK inhibition, although arthritis responding to glucocorticoids has been reported [1]. In this patient, an immunotherapy-related arthritis was probably triggered by checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ipilimumab and pembrolizumab). The arthritis persisted despite high-dose glucocorticoids and MTX. Adalimumab was effective and allowed discontinuation of glucocorticoids. Various IRAEs have been reported with the use of ICIs, including pruritus, diarrhoea, colitis, pneumonitis, endocrinopathies and hepatitis [2–4]. Rheumatological adverse events are less well described but include inflammatory arthritis, tenosynovitis, DM, GCA, PM and sicca symptoms [5, 6]. There are reports of ICI-related arthritis persisting for >12 months after cessation of the offending medi

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/rap/rky001

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oke, A. R., Wheater, M., Karydis, I., & Wallis, D.
Affiliations
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Wallis, Dinny
Venue
Rheumatology Advances in Practice
Published
2018-01-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
rky001-rky001
ISSN
2514-1775 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2794678890
Cited by
11
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Rheumatology Advances in Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
adalimumab, immune checkpoint inhibitors, immune-related adverse events, inflammatory arthritis, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, CTLA-4 blockade, anti-PD-1 therapy, melanoma, polyarthritis, prednisolone, TNF-alpha inhibitors, dabrafenib, trametinib, immunotherapy side effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review