The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Media Bias and Influence: Evidence from Newspaper Endorsements
Abstract
This paper investigates the relationship between media bias and the influence of the media on voting in the context of newspaper endorsements. We first develop a simple econometric model in which voters choose candidates under uncertainty and rely on endorsements from better informed sources. Newspapers are potentially biased in favour of one of the candidates and voters thus rationally account for the credibility of any endorsements. Our primary empirical finding is that endorsements are influential in the sense that voters are more likely to support the recommended candidate after publication of the endorsement. The degree of this influence, however, depends upon the credibility of the endorsement. In this way, endorsements for the Democratic candidate from left-leaning newspapers are less influential than are endorsements from neutral or right-leaning newspapers and likewise for endorsements for the Republican. We also find that endorsements are more influential among moderate voters and those more likely to be exposed to the endorsement. In sum, these findings suggest that voters do rely on the media for information during campaigns but that the extent of this reliance depends upon the degree and direction of any bias.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
Cited by
Ideological Segregation Online and Offline *
Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2011) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjr044 · Cited by 980
Bias in Cable News: Persuasion and Polarization
Martin, G. J., & Yurukoglu, A. (2017) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20160812 · Cited by 666
Social Media, News Consumption, and Polarization: Evidence from a Field Experiment
Levy, R. (2021) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20191777 · Cited by 624
Media and Political Persuasion: Evidence from Russia
Enikolopov, R., Petrova, M., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.7.3253 · Cited by 568
Radio and the Rise of The Nazis in Prewar Germany *
Adena, M., Enikolopov, R., Petrova, M., Santarosa, V., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2015) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjv030 · Cited by 546
The Effect of Newspaper Entry and Exit on Electoral Politics
Gentzkow, M., Shapiro, J. M., & Sinkinson, M. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.7.2980 · Cited by 497
Social Media and Protest Participation: Evidence From Russia
Enikolopov, R., Makarin, A., & Petrova, M. (2020) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta14281 · Cited by 489
More human than human: measuring ChatGPT political bias
Motoki, F., Pinho Neto, V., & Rodrigues, V. (2024) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/s11127-023-01097-2 · Cited by 329
Auditing Partisan Audience Bias within Google Search
Robertson, R. E., Jiang, S., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Lazer, D., & Wilson, C. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274417 · Cited by 209
Papageorge, N. W., Gershenson, S., & Kang, K. M. (2020) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00838 · Cited by 178
A Tear in the Iron Curtain: The Impact of Western Television on Consumption Behavior
Bursztyn, L., & Cantoni, D. (2016) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00522 · Cited by 116
The unintended consequences of internet diffusion: Evidence from Malaysia
Miner, L. (2015) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.10.002 · Cited by 113
Sheen, G. C.-H., Tung, H. H., & Wu, W.-C. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0260961 · Cited by 17
Chandra, A., & Kaiser, U. (2015) · Handbook of Media Economics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-62721-6.00009-3 · Cited by 15
Selection Neglect and Political Beliefs
Brundage, M., Little, A. T., & You, S. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/p49at · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Chiang, C.-F., & Knight, B.
- Venue
- The Review of Economic Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-02-16
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 795-820
- ISSN
- 0034-6527 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-937X
- OpenAlex
- W2117442186
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 76.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.