Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,295

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bank Liquidity Creation

Open access
Berger, Allen N., Bouwman, Christa H. S.·2009·Review of Financial Studies

Abstract

Although the modern theory of financial intermediation portrays liquidity creation as an essential service provided by banks, comprehensive measures of bank liquidity creation do not exist. We therefore have little understanding of how much liquidity banks create, how this liquidity creation changes over time, and the key factors that affect it. In this paper, we construct four comprehensive measures of bank liquidity creation and apply them to data on U.S. banks from 1993-2003. Based on our preferred measure, the amount of liquidity created by the banking sector has grown from less than $1.0 trillion in 1993 to over $1.5 trillion in 2003 in real dollars. Existing theories also provide specific predictions regarding the effect of bank capital on liquidity creation that have not been tested. We test the net effect of bank capital on liquidity creation to examine the circumstances under which the different theories empirically dominate. We find very different results for large and small banks. For large banks, capital has a weak positive effect on liquidity creation and for small banks, the effect is strongly negative. These results are robust to using alternative methods of measuring liquidity creation; using different measures of capital; and corrections to address a potential endogeneity problem associated with bank capital.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/rfs/hhn104

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Cited by

See all 1,295

Metadata

Authors
Berger, A. N., & Bouwman, C. H. S.
Venue
Review of Financial Studies
Published
2009-01-08
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
3779-3837
ISSN
  • 0893-9454 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-7368
OpenAlex
W2024539880
Cited by
1,295
References
67
FWCI
52.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bank Liquidity Creation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rfs/hhn104
The paper
Berger, A. N., & Bouwman, C. H. S. (2009). Bank Liquidity Creation. Review of Financial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn104

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.