Is Unbiased Financial Advice to Retail Investors Sufficient? Answers from a Large Field Study
Open accessAbstract
Working with one of the largest brokerages in Germany, we record what happens when unbiased investment advice is offered to a random set of roughly 8,000 of the brokerage’s several hundred thousand active retail customers. We find that investors who most need the financial advice are least likely to obtain it. The investors who do obtain the advice (about 5%), however, hardly follow the advice, and so do not improve their portfolio efficiency much. Overall, our results imply that the mere availability of unbiased financial advice is a necessary but not sufficient condition for benefiting retail investors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bhattacharya et al. (2012) find that customers of a German online broker who opted to obtain financial advice in a field study were among the most financially literate clients.
“Bhattacharya et al. (2012) find that those customers of a German online broker who opted to obtain financial advice in a field study were among the most financially literate clients”
From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as Bhattacharya et al. (2012)
Cites
Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(93)90023-5 · Cited by 25,754 · see citing works
On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance
Carhart, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x · Cited by 17,283 · see citing works
Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting
Laibson, D. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355397555253 · Cited by 6,122 · see citing works
Status quo bias in decision making
Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00055564 · Cited by 5,897 · see citing works
Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics
Kahneman, D. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803322655392 · Cited by 5,377 · see citing works
Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors
Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2000) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00226 · Cited by 3,955 · see citing works
Odean, T. (1999) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.89.5.1279 · Cited by 2,247 · see citing works
DiMatteo, M. R. (2004) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000114908.90348.f9 · Cited by 2,169 · see citing works
Bonaccio, S., & Dalal, R. S. (2006) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.07.001 · Cited by 1,011 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior
Stolper, O. A., & Walter, A. (2017) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-017-0853-9 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bhattacharya, U., Hackethal, A., Kaesler, S., Loos, B., & Meyer, S.
- Venue
- Review of Financial Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-01-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 975-1032
- ISSN
- 0893-9454 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7368
- OpenAlex
- W3124510896
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 53.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Review of Financial Studies (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
- Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- retail investors, investment advice, portfolio efficiency, brokerage, behavioral finance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review