The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Peer Pressure: Social Interaction and the Disposition Effect
Abstract
Social interaction contributes to some traders’ disposition effect. New data from an investment-specific social network linked to individual-level trading records builds evidence of this connection. To credibly estimate causal peer effects, I exploit the staggered entry of retail brokerages into partnerships with the social trading web platform and compare trader activity before and after exposure to these new social conditions. Access to the social network nearly doubles the magnitude of a trader’s disposition effect. Traders connected in the network develop correlated levels of the disposition effect, a finding that can be replicated using workhorse data from a large discount brokerage. Received September 8, 2015; accepted May 3, 2016 by Editor Stefan Nagel.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00122574 · Cited by 15,467
How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?
Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355304772839588 · Cited by 10,641
Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem
Manski, C. F. (1993) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2298123 · Cited by 6,209
Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment
Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355301556400 · Cited by 5,276
Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors
Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2000) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00226 · Cited by 3,955
Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses?
Odean, T. (1998) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00072 · Cited by 3,657
The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long: Theory and Evidence
SHEFRIN, H., & STATMAN, M. (1985) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05002.x · Cited by 3,553
A Theory of Social Interactions
Becker, G. S. (1974) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260265 · Cited by 2,969
A Theory of Social Interactions
Becker, G. (1974) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w0042 · Cited by 2,530
Economic Analysis of Social Interactions
Manski, C. F. (2000) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.14.3.115 · Cited by 2,064
Cited by
About the fear of reputational loss: Social trading and the disposition effect
Pelster, M., & Hofmann, A. (2018) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.07.003 · Cited by 85
Apesteguia, J., Oechssler, J., & Weidenholzer, S. (2020) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3508 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Heimer, R. Z.
- Venue
- Review of Financial Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-07-20
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3177-3209
- ISSN
- 0893-9454 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7368
- OpenAlex
- W3124359765
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 31.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Peer Pressure: Social Interaction and the Disposition Effect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rfs/hhw063
- The paper
- Heimer, R. Z. (2016). Peer Pressure: Social Interaction and the Disposition Effect. Review of Financial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhw063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.