Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

SROKE RECOVERY: HE CAN BUT DOES HE?

ANDREWS, KEITH, STEWARD, JEAN·1979·Rheumatology

Abstract

On assessing 29 consecutive stroke patients attending the Day Hospital of the Geriatric Unit it was found that there was a difference in what the patient could do in the unit and did do at home. Each activity of daily living was less well performed in the home situation in 25-45% of cases. In 52% of cases the chief carer claimed that the patient did not do two or more activities at home which the patient was capable of in the Day Hospital. This was not related to the features of the stroke but more to the attitude of the patient and his chief carer. Patients starting therapy late also did less well at home than in the rehabilitation unit. These findings emphasize the need to train the chief carer as well as the patient and also suggest the possible need for more home-orientated rehabilitation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/rheumatology/18.1.43

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
ANDREWS, K., & STEWARD, J.
Venue
Rheumatology
Published
1979
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
43-48
ISSN
  • 1462-0324 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-0332
OpenAlex
W2159320172
Cited by
198
References
0
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SROKE RECOVERY: HE CAN BUT DOES HE? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rheumatology/18.1.43
The paper
ANDREWS, K., & STEWARD, J. (1979). SROKE RECOVERY: HE CAN BUT DOES HE? Rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/18.1.43

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.