Cited by 112Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAction Observation and SynchronizationChild and Animal Learning Development

Distinct regions of medial rostral prefrontal cortex supporting social and nonsocial functions

Open access
Gilbert, Sam J., Williamson, Iain D. M., Dumontheil, Iroise, Simons, Jon S., Frith, Christopher D., Burgess, Paul W.·2007·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

While some recent neuroimaging studies have implicated medial rostral prefrontal cortex (MPFC) in 'mentalizing' and self-reflection, others have implicated this region in attention towards perceptual vs self-generated information. In order to reconcile these seemingly contradictory findings, we used fMRI to investigate MPFC activity related to these two functions in a factorial design. Participants performed two separate tasks, each of which alternated between 'stimulus-oriented phases' (SO), where participants attended to task-relevant perceptual information, and 'stimulus-independent phases' (SI), where participants performed the same tasks in the absence of such information. In half of the blocks ('mentalizing condition'), participants were instructed that they were performing these tasks in collaboration with an experimenter; in other blocks ('non-mentalizing condition'), participants were instructed that the experimenter was not involved. In fact, the tasks were identical in these conditions. Neuroimaging data revealed adjacent but clearly distinct regions of activation within MPFC related to (i) mentalizing vs non-mentalizing conditions (relatively caudal/superior) and (ii) SO vs SI attention (relatively rostral/inferior). These results generalized from one task to the other, suggesting a new axis of functional organization within MPFC.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsm014

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gilbert et al. (2007) confirmed that attention was located more anterior, at the tip of the mPFC, than mentalizing functions.

    “In a recent study comparing directly mentalizing and attention tasks, Gilbert et al. (2007) confirmed that attention was located more anterior (at the tip of the mPFC) than mentalizing functions.”

    From Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis (2009) · cites this paper as Gilbert et al. (2007)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gilbert, S. J., Williamson, I. D. M., Dumontheil, I., Simons, J. S., Frith, C. D., & Burgess, P. W.
Affiliations
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2007-05-17
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
217-226
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2152701493
Cited by
112
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (061171)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
mentalization, self-reflection, social cognition, attention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Cognition, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult, Theory of Mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review