The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attentional Vulnerability Indicators, Thought Disorder, and Negative Symptoms
Open accessAbstract
Deficits on two continuous performance test versions and the forced-choice span of apprehension task, which are potential vulnerability factors for schizophrenic disorders, were examined in relationship to particular symptoms of schizophrenic disorders, with emphasis on hypothesized relationships to formal thought disorder and negative symptoms. These interrelationships were determined concurrently within a group of 40 schizophrenic patients at an inpatient point. In addition, 32 of these patients were retested at a stabilized outpatient point to address the extent to which continued attentional deficits were associated with specific symptomatology during the hospitalized period. Signal-discrimination deficits on the three tasks were consistently associated with inpatient negative symptoms of schizophrenia as measured by the Anergia factor of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), across both the inpatient and outpatient assessments. The outpatient signal-discrimination deficits also showed significant, but less consistent, correlations with inpatient schizophrenic modes of thinking measured by the Rorschach Thought Disorder Index and with formal thought disorder measured by the BPRS Conceptual Disorganization rating. In contrast, no relationship with inpatient hallucinations or delusions was found. Combined with previous findings from high-risk samples, these results are consistent with the view that signal-discrimination deficits in situations demanding high levels of effortful processing are enduring vulnerability factors for schizophrenic negative symptoms and possibly for certain schizophrenic forms of thought disorder.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A feature-integration theory of attention.
Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5 · Cited by 12,366
The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.
Overall, J. E., & Gorham, D. R. (1962) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1962.10.3.799 · Cited by 11,090
(1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,293
(1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,899
Egeth, H., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421603 · Cited by 6,972
Research Diagnostic Criteria: Rationale and Reliability
Spitzer, R. L. (1978) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770300115013 · Cited by 6,951
Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.1.1 · Cited by 5,902
Dementia Praecox or the Group of Schizophrenias
(1951) · Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1951.02920270079043 · Cited by 4,407
Dementia Praecox and Paraphrenia.
(1972) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-76-6-1058_8 · Cited by 2,901
Automatic and effortful processes in memory.
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.108.3.356 · Cited by 2,812
Cited by
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity
Nuechterlein, K. H., Green, M. F., Kern, R. S., Baade, L. E., Barch, D. M., Cohen, J. D., Essock, S., Fenton, W. S., Frese, F. J., Gold, J. M., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07010042 · Cited by 2,342
Self-citationSchizophrenic Deficits in the Processing of Context: A Test of a Theoretical Model
Servan-Schreiber, D. (1996) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830120037008 · Cited by 462
Neurocognitive predictors of work outcome in recent-onset schizophrenia.
Nuechterlein, K. H., Subotnik, K. L., Green, M. F., Ventura, J., Asarnow, R. F., Gitlin, M. J., Yee, C. M., Gretchen-Doorly, D., & Mintz, J. (2011) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbr084 · Cited by 297
Longitudinal Study of Cognitive Function in First-Episode and Recent-Onset Schizophrenia
Gold, S., Arndt, S., Nopoulos, P., O’Leary, D. S., & Andreasen, N. C. (1999) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.156.9.1342 · Cited by 296
The negative symptoms of schizophrenia: A cognitive perspective
Rector, N. A., Beck, A. T., & Stolar, N. (2005) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674370505000503 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Nuechterlein, K. H., Edell, W. S., Norris, M., & Dawson, M. E.
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Bulletin
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1986-01-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 408-426
- ISSN
- 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1701
- OpenAlex
- W2072150922
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 8.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attentional Vulnerability Indicators, Thought Disorder, and Negative Symptoms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/schbul/12.3.408
- The paper
- Nuechterlein, K. H., Edell, W. S., Norris, M., & Dawson, M. E. (1986). Attentional Vulnerability Indicators, Thought Disorder, and Negative Symptoms. Schizophrenia Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/12.3.408
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.