Cited by 235Schizophrenia research and treatmentGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Neurexin 1 (NRXN1) Deletions in Schizophrenia

Open access
Kirov, G., Rujescu, D., Ingason, A., Collier, D. A., O'Donovan, M. C., Owen, M. J.·2009·Schizophrenia Bulletin

Abstract

Over the last 2 years, several reports have suggested that submicroscopic chromosomal deletions that disrupt the gene neurexin 1 (NRXN1) increase the risk of developing schizophrenia. In this article, we will review the evidence for this association. NRXN1 encodes NRXN1, a synaptic neuronal adhesion molecule. NRXNs are found presynaptically and are believed to interact with postsynaptic neuroligins (NLGNs) in excitatory and inhibitory synapses in the brain. The structure and possible function of NRXNs and NLGNs have recently been comprehensively reviewed.1 Vertebrate NRXNs and NLGNs are the only adhesion molecules for which a specifically synaptic function has been demonstrated.1 Current evidence suggests that NRXNs and NLGNs act transsynaptically to mediate essential signaling between presynaptic and postsynaptic specializations. Evidence from cell culture experiments and the study of mouse knockouts suggest that these molecules are required for synapse function but not for synapse formation, that they influence transsynaptic activation of synaptic transmission; and that their dysfunction impairs the properties of synapses and disrupts neural networks without completely abolishing synaptic transmission. NRXNs and NLGNs probably function by binding to each other and by interacting with intracellular proteins (most notably those with PDZ domain), but the precise mechanisms involved remain unknown.1 Whatever the mechanism and their relationship to synaptic function, it is clear that mice lacking NRXNs or NLGNs show marked deficits in synaptic transmission.1 There are 5 NLGN genes and 3 NRXN genes in humans (NRXN1 [2p16.3], NRXN2 [11q13], NRXN3 [14q31]). The 3 NRXN genes each encode an α protein and a β protein from independent promoters. NRXNs have a striking molecular diversity: the messenger RNA can be processed by alternative splicing, giving potentially thousands of distinct protein isoforms.2 There is strong evidence for an involvement of NLGNs and NRXN1 in autism (reviewed by Kumar and Christian3). Several studies reported an increased rate of deletions or other genetic variants in NRXN1 in subjects suffering with autism.4–11 Additionally, deletions in this gene have been implicated in mental retardation and developmental delay.12,13 A number of studies have reported NRXN1 deletions in cases with schizophrenia, which we will review in more detail. The first suggestion that NRXN1 deletions might confer risk of schizophrenia came from a study by Kirov et al.14 They used array comparative genome hybridization (array-CGH) to screen the genomes of 93 cases of schizophrenia recruited in Bulgaria with approximately 35 000 probes for chromosomal copy number variants (CNVs) at a resolution of about 80 000 bp. They identified a deletion of NRXN1 in a female case, which was also present in her affected brother. The deletion spanned the promoter and the first exon of the gene. Neither sibling had signs of premorbid cognitive problems or dysmorphic features. Given that deletions of NRXN1 were not seen in 372 controls, and at that time there were reports of NRXN1 deletions and point mutations in autism4,5 and one deletion in a subject with mental retardation,12 the authors hypothesized that deletions in this gene might confer risk to schizophrenia as well as to other neurodevelopmental disorders. Intriguingly, these authors also found a de novo duplication of 1.4Mb of chromosome 15 that involved, among other genes, amyloid beta A4 precursor protein-binding (APBA2) gene encoding a protein known as Mint2. Mint2 is a neuronal adaptor protein that binds directly to NRXNs in a PDZ domain–mediated interaction. Shortly after this initial report, Walsh et al,15 also using array-CGH, reported identical twins with early-onset schizophrenia who shared a 115-kb deletion in the gene (disrupting exons in the 3′ end) among a total of 233 schizophrenia cases and 268 controls. Array technology has progressed tremendously since these small early reports, and it is now possible routinely to detect CNVs using microarrays with up to 2 million probes covering the whole genome. Several groups have found deletions of NRXN1 in patients with schizophrenia using the new technologies. Rujescu et al16 examined NRXN1 for CNVs in 2977 schizophrenia patients and 33 746 control subjects from 7 European countries (Iceland, Finland, Norway, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, and the UK). Sixty-one NRXN1 deletions, including a de novo deletion, and 5 duplications were detected. Of these, 12 deletions and 2 duplications occurred in schizophrenia cases (0.47%) compared with 49 deletions and 3 duplications (0.15%) among the >10-fold larger control sample (P = .13, odds ratio [OR] = 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.81–3.50). There was no common breakpoint, and the CNVs varied in size from 18 to 420 kb. Because the penetrance of NRXN1 CNVs is likely to vary according to the level of functional impact on the gene, these authors next restricted analysis t

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/schbul/sbp079

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kirov, G., Rujescu, D., Ingason, A., Collier, D. A., O'Donovan, M. C., & Owen, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • deCODE Genetics (Iceland) (IS)
  • King's College London (GB)
Venue
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Published
2009-08-12
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
851-854
ISSN
  • 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1701
OpenAlex
W2127960585
Cited by
235
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 23
FWCI
16.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
NRXN1
MeSH terms
Animals, Autistic Disorder, Chromosome Deletion, Diseases in Twins, Genotype, Humans, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Duplication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review