The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
'Free us up so we can be responsible!' The co-evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and neo-liberalism in the UK, 1977-2010
Open accessAbstract
This article challenges the notion that Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is incompatible with neo-liberalism. It argues that CSR is not a countervailing force that follows neo-liberal market exposure. Instead of re-embedding global liberalism, CSR complements liberalization and substitutes for institutionalized social solidarity. Evidence from the UK, one of the world's leading jurisdictions for responsible business, supports these claims. In Britain during the past 30 years, neo-liberalism and CSR have co-evolved. CSR has been a quid pro quo for lighter regulation; it has compensated for some of the social dislocations that result from unfettering markets, thereby legitimating business during the ‘unleashing’ of capitalism, and it appeals to moral sensibilities, justifying and legitimating business leaders in a way that instrumental rationality alone cannot. The paper draws on original sources to shed light on the origins and growth of Business in the Community, one of the world's leading business-led CSR coalitions, since the 1970s.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2008.31193458 · Cited by 4,567
International regimes, transactions, and change: embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order
Ruggie, J. G. (1982) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300018993 · Cited by 4,463
HISTORICAL INSTITUTIONALISM IN COMPARATIVE POLITICS
Thelen, K. (1999) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369 · Cited by 3,409
(1998) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · Cited by 1,326
The age of responsibilization: on market-embedded morality
Shamir, R. (2008) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085140701760833 · Cited by 1,025
Corporate Social Responsibility in Western Europe: An Institutional Mirror or Substitute?
Jackson, G., & Apostolakou, A. (2010) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0269-8 · Cited by 830
Thatcher, M. (1993) · Cited by 789
A history of corporate social responsibility: concepts and practices
Carroll, A. B. (2007) · Cited by 572
Institutional Analysis and the Paradox of Corporate Social Responsibility
Campbell, J. L. (2006) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764205285172 · Cited by 534
What Is Organizational Imprinting? Cultural Entrepreneurship in the Founding of the Paris Opera
Johnson, V. (2007) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/517899 · Cited by 507
Cited by
Corporate Social Responsibility and institutional theory: new perspectives on private governance
Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D. (2012) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mwr030 · Cited by 1,134
Prügl, E. (2015) · New Political Economy · doi:10.1080/13563467.2014.951614 · Cited by 348
Reflections on the 2018 Decade Award: The Meaning and Dynamics of Corporate Social Responsibility
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2020) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0348 · Cited by 292
Kang, N., & Moon, J. (2012) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mwr025 · Cited by 279
COVID-19, Societalization, and the Future of Business in Society
Brammer, S., Branicki, L., & Linnenluecke, M. K. (2020) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2019.0053 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Kinderman, D.
- Venue
- Socio-Economic Review
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-11-23
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-57
- ISSN
- 1475-1461 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-147X
- OpenAlex
- W2035477861
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 20.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 'Free us up so we can be responsible!' The co-evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and neo-liberalism in the UK, 1977-2010. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ser/mwr028
- The paper
- Kinderman, D. (2012). 'Free us up so we can be responsible!' The co-evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and neo-liberalism in the UK, 1977-2010. Socio-Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwr028
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.