The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Intersecting Social Affiliations and Intermarriage
Abstract
A macrosociological theory's central principle, suggested by Simmel's concepts of crosscutting social circles and web of group affiliations, is that intersecting social differences promote intergroup relations. This theorem is tested with data on intermarriage rates in the 125 largest metropolitan areas in the United States. Since the theorem refers to intermarriage generally, the research testing reported here analyzes measures of ten different forms of intermarriage and not only the more commonly studied ethnic intermarriage. The theorem is respecified on the basis of preliminary analysis to stipulate that multiple, not merely bivariate, intersection of social affiliations fosters intermarriage, as is, indeed, implicit in the original theoretical discussion. Eight independent empirical tests corroborate the theorem that multiple intersection of social differences furthers not merely superficial but even profound and lasting intergroup relations. One of Simmel's profound insights is that the social structure of complex societies and communities entails multiple group affiliations with intersecting boundaries. Members of simple tribes also belong to several groups, but these typically are, from each person's own perspective, concentric social circles, such as one's immediate family, extended kin group, larger lineage, and encompassing clan. In modem society, on the other hand, a person's multiple group affiliations constitute mostly crosscutting circles,
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 · Cited by 18,567
Homophily in Voluntary Organizations: Status Distance and the Composition of Face-to-Face Groups
McPherson, J. M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1987) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095356 · Cited by 1,203
Social Boundaries and Marital Assimilation: Interpreting Trends in Racial and Ethnic Intermarriage
Qian, Z., & Lichter, D. T. (2007) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240707200104 · Cited by 616
Intermarriage and Social Distance Among U.S. Immigrants at the Turn of the Century
Pagnini, D. L., & Morgan, S. P. (1990) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/229534 · Cited by 269
Gaddis, S. M. (2012) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/sos003 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Blau, P. M., Beeker, C., & Fitzpatrick, K. M.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 1984-03-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 585-585
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977941421
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intersecting Social Affiliations and Intermarriage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/sf/62.3.585
- The paper
- Blau, P. M., Beeker, C., & Fitzpatrick, K. M. (1984). Intersecting Social Affiliations and Intermarriage. Social Forces. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/62.3.585
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.