Cited by 84Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentSocial Capital and NetworksYouth Development and Social Support

What’s in a relationship? An examination of social capital, race and class in mentoring relationships

Gaddis, S. M.·2012·Social Forces

Abstract

After 25 years of intense scrutiny, social capital remains an important yet highly debated concept in social science research. This research uses data from youth and mentors in several chapters of Big Brothers/Big Sisters to assess the importance of different mentoring relationship characteristics in creating positive outcomes among youths. The literature on social capital suggests that key characteristics are: (1. the amount of time spent between individuals, (2. racial similarity, (3. level of trust, (4. social class difference, and (5. intergenerational closure. I examine the effects of these social capital measures on academic and deviant behavioral outcomes and run models using propensity score weights to address selection bias. The results indicate that both the amount of time spent in a relationship and the level of trust consistently have positive effects for youths. Counter to what some theory suggests, race-matching and closure between parent and mentor have limited effects, and social class difference between individuals has no significant effect on any of the examined outcomes. These findings have important implications for future work on social capital and adolescent relationships in general.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sf/sos003

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The amount of time mentors and mentees spent together predicted increases in academic outcomes and declines in drug use in BBBS America.

    “Moreover, the amount of time mentors and mentees spent together predicted increases in academic outcomes and declines in drug use in BBBS America [45].”
  • These proximal benefits did not translate into differences in terms of consistent outcomes.

    “However, these proximal benefits did not translate into differences in terms of consistent outcomes [12,13,33,34,45,70,171].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaddis, S. M.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Gaddis, S. M.
Venue
Social Forces
Published
2012-05-23
Volume
90
Issue
4
Pages
1237-1269
ISSN
  • 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-7605
OpenAlex
W2168157331
Cited by
84
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Forces (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
Keywords
social capital, mentoring relationships, Big Brothers Big Sisters, youth mentoring, racial similarity, social class, trust, time spent together, educational outcomes, deviance, adolescent relationships, selection bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review