Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.

Adolescent Sexual Behavior and Friendship Choice

John O. G. Billy, J. Richard Udry, Joseph Lee Rodgers·1984·Social Forces

Abstract

With data from a junior high school in an urban area of North Carolina we use log-odds ratios and a nested contingency table model to investigate homogeneity bias in adolescent friendship choice along the dimension of sexual behavior. Females, both black and white, tend to name friends whose sexual behavior is like their own even when grade, other more visible deviant behaviors, and a composite index of deviance proneness are taken into account. In contrast, neither sexual intercourse nor any other deviant behavior considered in this analysis is a significant factor in accounting for male adolescent friendship structure. We suggest that the differential reputational consequences for males and females who have intercourse may account for the observed difference by sex in the friendship choice-sexual behavior relationship.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1093/sf/62.3.653

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Billy, J. O. G., Udry, J. R., & Rodgers, J. L.
Venue
Social Forces
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Published
1984-03-01
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
653-653
ISSN
0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100413046
Cited by
166
References
0
FWCI
9.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.