The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Publish and Perish? An Assessment of Gender Gaps in Promotion to Tenure in Academia
Open accessAbstract
In academia, there remains a gender gap in promotion to tenure, such that men are more likely to receive tenure than women. This paper tests three explanations of this gender gap in promotion: (1) contextual and organizational differences across departments; (2) performance/productivity differences by gender; and (3) gendered inequality in evaluation. To test these explanations, this project uses a novel dataset drawing from a sample of assistant professors in Sociology, Computer Science, and English, across research universities. This dataset combines data from sources including curriculum vitae, Google Scholar, and web archive employment data, resulting in a dataset of assistant professors’ publication records, department affiliations, and job positions. Analyses examine the gender gap in the likelihood of promotion to tenure and in early career trajectories, while accounting for publication productivity and department/university context. The results demonstrate that productivity measures account for a portion of the gender gap in tenure, but in each discipline a substantial share of the gender gap remains unexplained by these factors. Department characteristics do not explain the tenure gender gap. Further, when women do receive tenure, they do so in lower-prestige departments than men, on average. These findings suggest that gendered inequality in the tenure evaluation process contributes to the gender gap in tenure rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1211286109 · Cited by 3,150
Human Capital, Effort, and the Sexual Division of Labor
Becker, G. S. (1985) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/298075 · Cited by 2,417
Ridgeway, C. L. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199755776.001.0001 · Cited by 1,480
An extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition technique to logit and probit models
Fairlie, R. W. (2005) · Journal of Economic and Social Measurement · doi:10.3233/jem-2005-0259 · Cited by 1,077
Constraints into Preferences: Gender, Status, and Emerging Career Aspirations
Correll, S. J. (2004) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240406900106 · Cited by 935
Men and Women at Work: Sex Segregation and Statistical Discrimination
Bielby, W. T., & Baron, J. N. (1986) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228350 · Cited by 907
Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., Ovadia, S., & Vanneman, R. (2001) · Social Forces · doi:10.1353/sof.2001.0091 · Cited by 894 · cited 2×
“Compared to men, women are less likely to hold managerial positions (Cotter et al. 2001); serve on executive boards (Ragins, Townsend, and Mattis 1998); become partners in law firms (e.”
BackgroundThe Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship
West, J. D., Jacquet, J., King, M. M., Correll, S. J., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066212 · Cited by 892
Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations.
Lorber, J., Reskin, B. F., & Roos, P. A. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2076166 · Cited by 859
The Absence of the African‐American Owned Business: An Analysis of the Dynamics of Self‐Employment
Fairlie, R. W. (1999) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/209914 · Cited by 852
Cited by
Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions
Llorens, A., Tzovara, A., Bellier, L., Bhaya-Grossman, I., Bidet-Caulet, A., Chang, W. K., Cross, Z. R., Dominguez-Faus, R., Flinker, A., Fonken, Y., et al. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002 · Cited by 361
Swedberg, R. (2020) · The Production of Knowledge · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.002 · Cited by 293
The right to audit and power asymmetries in algorithm auditing
Urman, A., Smirnov, I., & Lasser, J. (2024) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00454-5 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Weisshaar, K.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-06-28
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 529-560
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-7605
- OpenAlex
- W2727795945
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 37.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Publish and Perish? An Assessment of Gender Gaps in Promotion to Tenure in Academia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/sf/sox052
- The paper
- Weisshaar, K. (2017). Publish and Perish? An Assessment of Gender Gaps in Promotion to Tenure in Academia. Social Forces. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sox052
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.