Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 361

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 188 of the 188 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions

Open access
Llorens, Anaïs, Tzovara, Athina, Bellier, Ludovic, Bhaya-Grossman, Ilina, Bidet-Caulet, Aurélie, Chang, William K., Cross, Zachariah R., Dominguez-Faus, Rosa, Flinker, Adeen, Fonken, Yvonne, Gorenstein, Mark A., Holdgraf, Chris, Hoy, Colin W., Ivanova, Maria V., Jimenez, Richard T., Jun, Soyeon, Kam, Julia W.Y., Kidd, Celeste, Marcelle, Enitan, Marciano, Deborah, Martin, Stephanie, Myers, Nicholas E., Ojala, Karita, Perry, Anat, Pinheiro-Chagas, Pedro, Riès, Stephanie K., Saez, Ignacio, Skelin, Ivan, Slama, Katarina, Staveland, Brooke, Bassett, Danielle S., Buffalo, Elizabeth A., Fairhall, Adrienne L., Kopell, Nancy J., Kray, Laura J., Lin, Jack J., Nobre, Anna C., Riley, Dylan, Solbakk, Anne-Kristin, Wallis, Joni D., Wang, Xiao-Jing, Yuval-Greenberg, Shlomit, Kastner, Sabine, Knight, Robert T., Dronkers, Nina F.·2021·Neuron

Abstract

Despite increased awareness of the lack of gender equity in academia and a growing number of initiatives to address issues of diversity, change is slow and inequalities remain. A major source of inequity is gender bias, which has a substantial negative impact on the careers, work-life balance, and mental health of underrepresented groups in science. Here, we argue that gender bias is not a single problem but manifests as a collection of distinct issues that impact researchers' lives. We disentangle these facets and propose concrete solutions that can be adopted by individuals, academic institutions, and society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002

Cites

188 of 188 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 188 references

Cited by

See all 361

Metadata

Authors
Llorens, A., Tzovara, A., Bellier, L., Bhaya-Grossman, I., Bidet-Caulet, A., Chang, W. K., Cross, Z. R., Dominguez-Faus, R., Flinker, A., Fonken, Y., Gorenstein, M. A., Holdgraf, C., Hoy, C. W., Ivanova, M. V., Jimenez, R. T., Jun, S., Kam, J. W. Y., Kidd, C., Marcelle, E., Marciano, D., Martin, S., Myers, N. E., Ojala, K., Perry, A., Pinheiro-Chagas, P., Riès, S. K., Saez, I., Skelin, I., Slama, K., Staveland, B., Bassett, D. S., Buffalo, E. A., Fairhall, A. L., Kopell, N. J., Kray, L. J., Lin, J. J., Nobre, A. C., Riley, D., Solbakk, A.-K., Wallis, J. D., Wang, X.-J., Yuval-Greenberg, S., Kastner, S., Knight, R. T., & Dronkers, N. F.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
109
Issue
13
Pages
2047-2074
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3170390204
Cited by
361
References
188
FWCI
60.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002
The paper
Llorens, A., Tzovara, A., Bellier, L., Bhaya-Grossman, I., Bidet-Caulet, A., Chang, W. K., Cross, Z. R., Dominguez-Faus, R., Flinker, A., Fonken, Y., Gorenstein, M. A., Holdgraf, C., Hoy, C. W., Ivanova, M. V., Jimenez, R. T., Jun, S., Kam, J. W. Y., Kidd, C., Marcelle, E., . . . Dronkers, N. F. (2021). Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions. Neuron. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.