Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 205

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Blood Pressure “Dipping” and “Non-Dipping” in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Patients

Suzuki, Mayumi, Guilleminault, Christian, Otsuka, Kuniaki, Shiomi, Toshiaki·1996·Sleep

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) has been associated with a higher than normal cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Some OSAS patients lack the sleep-related, nocturnal decrease, or "dip," in blood pressure which is seen in normal individuals. These subjects, called "non-dippers," may be at greater risk for cardiovascular problems. We studied 40 OSAS patients (including 3 women) and 6 control subjects, all identified by polysomnography, for nocturnal blood pressure "dipping." We performed a second nocturnal polysomnogram to determine their apnea and hypopnea indices, (A + H)I, and oxygen saturation levels at the beginning of the study and then initiated 48 hours of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, with data points collected every 30 minutes. Controls, which included one hypertensive subject, were all dippers. Nineteen OSAS subjects (48% of OSAS individuals) were systolic non-dippers and only 9 of them (22.5%) were diastolic non-dippers. We considered the following clinical variables as potential predictors of non-dipping: age, body mass index, respiratory disturbance index, years of reported loud snoring by bed partners, lowest oxygen saturation during nocturnal sleep, and percentage of sleep time spent with oxygen saturation below 90%. Multiple regression analyses indicated respiratory disturbance index as the only significant variable for systolic (p = 0.04) and diastolic (p = 0.03) blood pressure non-dipping. When we forced the following two nonsignificant variables into the model, they showed a very meager impact: number of years with reported loud snoring (p = 0.4 and p = 0.5, respectively for systolic and diastolic blood pressure non-dipping) and age (p = 0.5 and p = 0.6). The calculated model explained only a low percentage of the variance with an r2 of 0.25 and 0.26 for systolic and diastolic blood pressure non-dipping, respectively. Analysis of hypertension/normotension and dipping/non-dipping failed to show a significant relationship in the studied population. Fifty percent of the normotensive OSAS subjects were non-dippers and 43% of the hypertensive OSAS subjects were also non-dippers. We found a relationship between increasing respiratory disturbance index and increasing average 24-hour systolic blood pressure only when OSAS subjects were non-dippers and hypertensive.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/19.5.382

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 205

Metadata

Authors
Suzuki, M., Guilleminault, C., Otsuka, K., & Shiomi, T.
Venue
Sleep
Published
1996-07
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
382-387
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W112211129
Cited by
205
References
0
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blood Pressure “Dipping” and “Non-Dipping” in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/sleep/19.5.382
The paper
Suzuki, M., Guilleminault, C., Otsuka, K., & Shiomi, T. (1996). Blood Pressure “Dipping” and “Non-Dipping” in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Patients. Sleep. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/19.5.382

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.