Cited by 193Sleep and related disordersSleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Sleep in the Laboratory and Sleep at Home: Comparisons of Older Insomniacs and Normal Sleepers

Edinger, Jack D., Fins, Ana I., Sullivan, Robert J., Marsh, Gail R., Dailey, Dorothy S., Hope, T. Victor, Young, Margaret, Shaw, Edmund +2 more·1997·Sleep

Abstract

Many laboratory polysomnographic (LPSG) studies have shown only modest sleep differences between insomniacs and matched, noncomplaining normal controls. However, the extent to which LPSG methodology affects the outcome of such comparisons has yet to be tested. In the current investigation, 32 (16 females, 16 males) older (age > or = 60 years) insomniacs and an age-matched and gender-matched sample of 32 noncomplaining normal sleepers underwent three consecutive nights of LPSG monitoring and another three consecutive nights of PSG monitoring in their homes (HPSG). By random assignment, one-half of the subjects in each group underwent LPSG first, whereas the remaining subjects underwent HPSG first. Each PSG recording was blindly scored using conventional scoring criteria, and resulting measures of total sleep period, total sleep time, sleep efficiency percent, stage 1 time, slow-wave sleep time, and rapid eye movement latency were used to compare the two subject groups within each PSG recording site (i.e. lab and home). Statistical analyses showed the normals sleepers and insomniacs evidenced similar pronounced first night effects (FNEs) when undergoing LPSG. However, neither mean values of the selected sleep parameters nor measures reflecting their night-to-night variability differentiated the insomniacs from the normal sleepers when such measures were derived from LPSG. In contrast, FNEs were generally absent for both subject groups when they underwent HPSG. Moreover, the insomniacs displayed significantly greater variability in several of their sleep measures during HPSG than did the normal sleepers. Overall, results suggest FNEs are a concern mainly when using LPSG, and HPSG may be more sensitive than LPSG for documenting sleep differences between normal sleepers and insomniacs. Additional studies are needed to determine if the findings reported herein are similar for young and middle-aged adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/20.12.1119

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Rechtschaffen A, Verdone P. Amount of dreaming: effect of incentive and adaptation to laboratory and individual differ- ences. Percept Mot Skills 1964;19:947-58.
  2. Agnew HW, Webb WB, Williams RL. The first night effect: an EEG study of sleep. Psychophysiology 1966;2:263-6.
  3. Mendelson WB, Garnett D, Gillin IC, Weingartner H. The ex- perience of insomnia and daytime and nighttime functioning. Psychiatry Res 1984;12:235-50.
  4. Gallard JM. Chronic primary insomnia: possible physiopathol- Sleep, Vol. 20, No. 12, 1997 ogical involvement of slow wave sleep deficiency. Sleep 1978; 1:133-47.
  5. Sharpley AL, Solomon R, Cowen P. First night effect on sleep using ambulatory cassette recording. Sleep 1988;11 :273-6.
  6. Schramm E, Hohagen F, Grasshoff MA, et al. Test-retest reli- ability and validity of the structured interview for sleep disorder according to DSM-III-R. Am J Psychiatry 1993;150:867-72.
  7. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edition, revised. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.
  8. American Psychiatric Press. Structured clinical interview for DSM•11I-R (SClD). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1990.
  9. Mendelson WB. Are periodic limb movements associated with clinical sleep disturbance? Sleep 1996;19:219-23.
  10. McCall WV, Erwin CW, Edinger JD, Krystal AD, Marsh GR. Ambulatory polysomnography: technical aspects and normative data. J Clin Neurophysiol 1992;9:68-77.
  11. Ancoli-Isreal S, Kripke DF, Mason W, Messin S. Comparisons of home sleep recordings and polysomnography in older adults with sleep disorders. Sleep 1981;4:283-91.
  12. Hoelscher TJ, McCall WV, Powell J, Marsh GR, Erwin Cw. Two methods for scoring sleep with the Oxford Medilog 9000: comparison to conventional paper scoring. Sleep 1989; 12: 133- 39.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Edinger, J. D., Fins, A. I., Sullivan, R. J., Marsh, G. R., Dailey, D. S., Hope, T. V., Young, M., Shaw, E., Carlson, D., & Vasilas, D.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Durham VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Edinger, Jack D.
Venue
Sleep
Published
1997-12
Volume
20
Issue
12
Pages
1119-1126
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W1559462948
Cited by
193
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
FWCI
6.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (5P60-AG11268, P60AG011268)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01 RR 30)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
insomnia, older adults, home sleep monitoring, first-night effect, night-to-night variability, sleep efficiency, slow-wave sleep, REM latency, sleep stage distribution
MeSH terms
Aged, Electromyography, Electrooculography, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Sleep, REM, Polysomnography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review