The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Practice Parameters for the Evaluation of Chronic Insomnia
Abstract
Chronic insomnia is the most common sleep complaint which health care practitioners must confront. Most insomnia patients are not, however, seen by sleep physicians but rather by a variety of primary care physicians. There is little agreement concerning methods for effective assessment and subsequent differential diagnosis of this pervasive problem. The most common basis for diagnosis and subsequent treatment has been the practitioner's clinical impression from an unstructured interview. No systematic, evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis exist for chronic insomnia. This practice parameter paper presents recommendations for the evaluation of chronic insomnia based on the evidence in the accompanying review paper. We recommend use of these parameters by the sleep community, but even more importantly, hope the large number of primary care physicians providing this care can benefit from their use. Conclusions reached in these practice parameters include the following recommendations for the evaluation of chronic insomnia. Since the complaint of insomnia is so widespread and since patients may overlook the impact of poor sleep quality on daily functioning, the health care practitioner should screen for a history of sleep difficulty. This evaluation should include a sleep history focused on common sleep disorders to identify primary and secondary insomnias. Polysomnography, and the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) should not be routinely used to screen or diagnose patients with insomnia complaints. However, the complaint of insomnia does not preclude the appropriate use of these tests for diagnosis of specific sleep disorders such as obstructive sleep apnea, periodic limb movement disorder, and narcolepsy that may be present in patients with insomnia. There is insufficient evidence to suggest whether portable sleep studies, actigraphy, or other alternative assessment measures including static charge beds are effective in the evaluation of insomnia complaints. Instruments such as sleep logs, self-administered questionnaires, symptom checklist, or psychological screening tests may be of benefit to discriminate insomnia patients from normals, but these instruments have not been shown to differentiate subtypes of insomnia complaints.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gradisar, M., Gardner, G., & Dohnt, H. (2011) · Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2010.11.008 · Cited by 1,196
Insomnia with objective short sleep duration: The most biologically severe phenotype of the disorder
Vgontzas, A. N., Fernandez-Mendoza, J., Liao, D., & Bixler, E. O. (2013) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2012.09.005 · Cited by 776
Distinguishing sleepiness and fatigue: focus on definition and measurement
Shen, J., Barbera, J., & Shapiro, C. M. (2006) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2005.05.004 · Cited by 687
Espie, C. A. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135243 · Cited by 596
Quantitative criteria for insomnia
Lichstein, K. L., Durrence, H. H., Taylor, D. J., Bush, A. J., & Riedel, B. W. (2003) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(02)00023-2 · Cited by 531
Metadata
- Authors
- Chesson, A., Hartse, K., Anderson, W. M., Davila, D., Johnson, S., Littner, M., Wise, M., & Rafecas, J.
- Venue
- Sleep
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-5
- ISSN
- 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-9109
- OpenAlex
- W2914221435
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Practice Parameters for the Evaluation of Chronic Insomnia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/sleep/23.2.1k
- The paper
- Chesson, A., Hartse, K., Anderson, W. M., Davila, D., Johnson, S., Littner, M., Wise, M., & Rafecas, J. (2000). Practice Parameters for the Evaluation of Chronic Insomnia. Sleep. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/23.2.1k
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.