Cited by 531Sleep and related disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Quantitative criteria for insomnia

Lichstein, K.L., Durrence, H.H., Taylor, D.J., Bush, A.J., Riedel, B.W.·2003·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Formal diagnostic systems (DSM-IV, ICSD, and ICD-10) do not provide adequate quantitative criteria to diagnose insomnia. This may not present a serious problem in clinical settings where extensive interviews determine the need for clinical management. However, lack of standard criteria introduce disruptive variability into the insomnia research domain. The present study reviewed two decades of psychology clinical trials for insomnia to determine common practice with regard to frequency, severity, and duration criteria for insomnia. Modal patterns established frequency (> or =3 nights a week) and duration (> or =6 months) standard criteria. We then applied four versions of severity criteria to a random sample and used sensitivity-specificity analyses to identify the most valid criterion. We found that severity of sleep onset latency or wake time after sleep onset of: (a) > or =31 min; (b) occurring > or =3 nights a week; (c) for > or =6 months are the most defensible quantitative criteria for insomnia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7967(02)00023-2

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although no specific quantitative sleep parameters define insomnia disorder, common complaints for insomnia patients are an average sleep latency >30 minutes, wake after sleep onset >30 minutes, sleep efficiency <85%, and/or total sleep time <6.5 hours.

    “Although no specific quan -titative sleep parameters define insomnia disorder, common complaints for insomnia patients are an average sleep latency >30 minutes, wake after sleep onset >30 minutes, sleep effi -ciency <85%, and/or total sleep time <6.5 hours. 19,20”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lichstein, K. L., Durrence, H. H., Taylor, D. J., Bush, A. J., & Riedel, B. W.
Affiliations
University of Memphis (US)
Corresponding author
Lichstein, K.L.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-04
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
427-445
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044353450
Cited by
531
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 27
FWCI
13.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG12136, #AG14738, R01AG014738, R01AG012136)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
insomnia, sleep latency, wake after sleep onset, severity criteria, sensitivity and specificity, clinical trials, DSM-IV, ICD-10, ICSD
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Predictive Value of Tests, Research Design, Severity of Illness Index, Sleep Stages, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review