Cited by 168Sleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness Research

Psychomotor Performance Defcits and Their Relation to Prior Nights' Sleep Among Individuals with Primary Insomnia

Open access
Edinger, Jack D., Means, Melanie K., Carney, Colleen E., Krystal, Andrew D.·2008·Sleep

Abstract

Objective To examine psychomotor (reaction time) performance deficits and their relation to subjective and objective sleep measures among individuals with primary insomnia (PI). Design and setting This study was conducted at affiliated VA and academic medical centers using a matched-groups, cross-sectional research design. Participants Seventy-nine (43 women) individuals with PI (MAge = 50.0 +/- 17.1 y) and 84 (41 women) well-screened normal sleepers (MAge = 48.6 +/- 16.8 y). Methods and measures Participants underwent 3 nights of polysomnography (PSG) followed by daytime testing with a 4-trial multiple sleep latency test (MSLT). Before each MSLT nap, they rated their sleepiness and completed a performance battery that included simple reaction time (SRT), continuous performance (CPT), and 4 switching attention (SAT) tests. Performance measures included the mean response latency and the standard deviation of each subject's within-test response latencies. Results PI sufferers reported greater (P = 0.001) daytime sleepiness, but were significantly (P = 0.02), more alert than normal sleepers on the MSLT. Multivariate analyses showed the PI group had significantly longer response latencies and greater response variability across many of the subtests than did the controls. Regression analyses showed that both PSG- and diary-based sleep measures contributed to the prediction of daytime performance indices, although objective wake time after sleep onset appeared the best single predi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/31.5.599

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Edinger, J. D., Means, M. K., Carney, C. E., & Krystal, A. D.
Affiliations
Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Edinger, Jack D.
Venue
Sleep
Published
2008-05
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
599-607
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W2100354242
Cited by
168
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
FWCI
21.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL073259, R01-HL-073259-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
primary insomnia, psychomotor performance, reaction time, daytime sleepiness, multiple sleep latency test, wake after sleep onset, sleep deprivation, attention, response latency, sleep diary, polysomnography
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Arousal, Attention, Attitude to Health, Cognition Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Culture, Female, Humans, Disorders of Excessive Somnolence, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Wakefulness, Cohort Studies, Polysomnography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review