Cited by 62Sleep and related disordersSleep and Wakefulness ResearchParanormal Experiences and Beliefs

Dream-enacting behaviors in a normal population

Open access
Nielsen, Tore, Svob, Connie, Kuiken, Don·2009·SLEEP

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Determine the prevalence and gender distributions of behaviors enacted during dreaming ("dream-enacting [DE] behaviors") in a normal population; the independence of such behaviors from other parasomnias; and the influence of different question wordings, socially desirable responding and personality on prevalence. DESIGN: 3-group questionnaire study. SETTING: University classrooms PARTICIPANTS: Three undergraduate samples (Ns = 443, 201, 496; mean ages = 19.9 +/- 3.2 y; 20.1 +/- 3.4 y; 19.1 +/- 1.6 y). INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Subjects completed questionnaires about DE behaviors and Social Desirability. Study 1 employed a nonspecific question about the behaviors, Study 2 employed the same question with examples, and Study 3 employed 7 questions describing specific behavior subtypes (speaking, crying, smiling/laughing, fear, anger, movement, sexual arousal). Somnambulism, somniloquy, nightmares, dream recall, alexithymia, and absorption were also assessed. Factor analyses were conducted to determine relationships among DE behaviors and their independence from other parasomnias. Prevalence increased with increasing question specificity (35.9%, 76.7%, and 98.2% for the 3 samples). No gender difference obtained for the nonspecific question, but robust differences occurred for more specific questions. Females reported more speaking, crying, fear and smiling/laughing than did males; males reported more sexual arousal. When controlling other parasomnias and dream recall frequency, these differences persisted. Factor solutions revealed that DE behaviors were independent of other parasomnias and of dream recall frequency, except for an association between dream-talking and somniloquy. Sexual arousal was related only to age. Behaviors were independent of alexithymia but moderately related to absorption. CONCLUSIONS: Dream-enacting behaviors are prevalent in healthy subjects and sensitive to question wording but not social desirability. Subtypes are related, differ with gender and occur independently of other parasomnias.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/32.12.1629

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Mahowald MW, Schenck CH. REM sleep parasomnias. In: Kryger MH, Roth T, Dement WC, eds. Principles and practice of sleep medicine. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2005:897-916.
  2. Obama B. Dreams from my father. A story of race and inheritance. New York: Three Rivers Press, 1995.
  3. Shapiro CM, Trajanovic NN, Fedoroff JP. Sexsomnia--a new parasom- nia? Can J Psychiatr 2003;48:311-17.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nielsen, T., Svob, C., & Kuiken, D.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Venue
SLEEP
Published
2009-12
Volume
32
Issue
12
Pages
1629-1636
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W2160564172
Cited by
62
References
22
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
Keywords
parasomnias, sleepwalking, nightmares, dream recall, gender differences, question wording, social desirability, alexithymia, absorption, prevalence, healthy adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior, Dreams, Emotions, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Personality, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mental Recall, Reference Values, Sexual Behavior, Social Desirability, Prevalence, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Parasomnias, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review