CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 177Sleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related FatigueCOVID-19 and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Short Sleep Duration in Prevalent and Persistent Psychological Distress in Young Adults: The DRIVE Study

Open access
Glozier, Nicholas, Martiniuk, Alexandra, Patton, George, Ivers, Rebecca, Li, Qiang, Hickie, Ian, Senserrick, Teresa, Woodward, Mark, Norton, Robyn, Stevenson, Mark·2010·Sleep
DOI 10.1093/sleep/33.9.1139PMC PMC2938854
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Young people are sleeping less. Short sleep duration has a range of negative consequences including a hypothesized link with psychological distress, which has yet to be studied DESIGN: Prospective cohort study SETTING: Community-based sample from Australia PARTICIPANTS: Twenty thousand (20,822) young adults (aged 17-24) identified through the state vehicle licensing authority. A random sample (n = 5000) was approached for follow-up 12-18 months later, with 2837 providing full data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Psychological distress, determined by a Kessler 10 score > 21, at baseline; and as both onset and persistence of distress at follow-up. RESULTS: Shorter sleep duration was linearly associated with prevalent psychological distress: relative risk (RR) 1.14 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.15). Only the very short (< 5 h) sleepers among those not distressed at baseline had an increased risk for onset of psychological distress (RR 3.25 [95% CI 1.84, 5.75]). Of 945 cohort participants reporting psychological distress at baseline, 419 (44%) were distressed at follow-up. Each hour less of sleep increased the risk of psychological distress persisting after adjustment for potential confounding variables: RR 1.05 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.10). Long sleep duration showed no association with distress at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported shorter sleep duration is linearly associated with prevalent and persistent psychological distress in young adults. In contrast, only the very short sleepers had a raised risk of new onset of distress. Different approaches to sleep duration measurement yield different results and should guide any interventions to improve subjective sleep duration in young adults.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/33.9.1139

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2004, Methodology of the youth risk behaviour surveillance system, MMWR CDC Surveill Summ, 53, 1
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2006, How Australians use their time, 2006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–177 of 177

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Glozier, N., Martiniuk, A., Patton, G., Ivers, R., Li, Q., Hickie, I., Senserrick, T., Woodward, M., Norton, R., & Stevenson, M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
ORCID
Venue
Sleep
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2010-09
Volume
33
Issue
9
Pages
1139-1145
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
DOI
10.1093/sleep/33.9.1139
PMC
PMC2938854
OpenAlex
W1736076239
Cited by
177
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Sanofi
  • European Psychiatric Association
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
short sleep duration, psychological distress, young adults, Kessler K10, sleep and mental health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Australia, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Cohort Studies, Prevalence, Dyssomnias, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review