Cited by 139Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNeuroscience of respiration and sleepSleep and related disorders

Loop Gain Predicts the Response to Upper Airway Surgery in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Open access
Joosten, Simon A., Leong, Paul, Landry, Shane A., Sands, Scott A., Terrill, Philip I., Mann, Dwayne, Turton, Anthony, Rangaswamy, Jhanavi +5 more·2017·Sleep

Abstract

Study Objectives: Upper airway surgery is often recommended to treat patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who cannot tolerate continuous positive airways pressure. However, the response to surgery is variable, potentially because it does not improve the nonanatomical factors (ie, loop gain [LG] and arousal threshold) causing OSA. Measuring these traits clinically might predict responses to surgery. Our primary objective was to test the value of LG and arousal threshold to predict surgical success defined as 50% reduction in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and AHI <10 events/hour post surgery. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent upper airway surgery for OSA (n = 46). Clinical estimates of LG and arousal threshold were calculated from routine polysomnographic recordings presurgery and postsurgery (median of 124 [91-170] days follow-up). Results: Surgery reduced both the AHI (39.1 ± 4.2 vs. 26.5 ± 3.6 events/hour; p < .005) and estimated arousal threshold (-14.8 [-22.9 to -10.2] vs. -9.4 [-14.5 to -6.0] cmH2O) but did not alter LG (0.45 ± 0.08 vs. 0.45 ± 0.12; p = .278). Responders to surgery had a lower baseline LG (0.38 ± 0.02 vs. 0.48 ± 0.01, p < .05) and were younger (31.0 [27.3-42.5] vs. 43.0 [33.0-55.3] years, p < .05) than nonresponders. Lower LG remained a significant predictor of surgical success after controlling for covariates (logistic regression p = .018; receiver operating characteristic area under curve = 0.80). Conclusions: Our study provides proof-of-principle that upper airway surgery most effectively resolves OSA in patients with lower LG. Predicting the failure of surgical treatment, consequent to less stable ventilatory control (elevated LG), can be achieved in the clinic and may facilitate avoidance of surgical failures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/zsx094

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Elevated loop gain has been found to predict failure of sleep apnea surgeries, at least in some cases.

    “From a surgical perspective, elevated loop gain may be important since it has been found to predict failure of sleep apnea surgeries, at least in some cases.363–365”

    From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [365]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]20. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL Jr. ASA physical status classifica- tions: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology. 1978; 49(4): 239-243.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joosten, S. A., Leong, P., Landry, S. A., Sands, S. A., Terrill, P. I., Mann, D., Turton, A., Rangaswamy, J., Andara, C., Burgess, G., Mansfield, D., Hamilton, G. S., & Edwards, B. A.
Affiliations
  • Monash Medical Centre (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Monash Health (AU)
Corresponding author
Joosten, Simon A.
Venue
Sleep
Published
2017-05-22
Volume
40
Issue
7
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W2617097908
Cited by
139
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 2
FWCI
13.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • American Heart Association (15SDG25890059)
  • American Thoracic Society
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1064163, 1035115, 1053201)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, upper airway surgery, loop gain, arousal threshold, apnea-hypopnea index, ventilation control, polysomnography, surgical failure
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Respiratory System, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review