0379 A Randomized Controlled Trial Of CBT-I and CPAP For Comorbid Insomnia and OSA: Initial Findings from the MATRICS Study
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of three treatment sequences using CPAP with or without CBT-I for the treatment of comorbid insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea (COMISA). One-hundred and twenty-one adults (52.50% female, mean age=50.00) with COMISA were randomized to receive one of three treatment models using a partial factorial design: CBT-I followed by CPAP (Model A), CBT-I concurrent with CPAP (Model B), and CPAP only (Model C). CPAP was delivered following standard procedures for in-lab CPAP titration and home set-up with a third-party vendor. CBT-I was delivered in four individual sessions. Primary outcomes were CPAP adherence across the first 90 days of use and global measures of insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index; ISI) and sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; PSQI). Planned comparisons were conducted on those who received CBT-I+CPAP (Models A and B combined) versus CPAP only (Model C) using Wilcoxon signed ranks test and linear mixed models. No significant differences were found between the CPAP+CBT-I groups versus the CPAP only group on percent of nights used (Median=48.65% vs Median=71.10%, p=.29), minutes used per night (Median=232.87 vs Median=186.06, p=.21) or percentage of participants who were regular CPAP users (≥4 hours on ≥70% of nights during 30-day period; 37.50% vs 36.59%, p=.92). For mild OSA (AHI≥5 and <15), the CPAP+CBT-I groups used CPAP on a greater percentage of nights compared to the CPAP only group (Median=30.00% vs Median=5.00%), which approached significance (p=.05). A significant main effect was found for improvement in the ISI (p<.0001) and PSQI (p<.0001) but the interaction was not significant for either measure. These findings indicate that patients with COMISA show improvements in self-reported global measures of insomnia and sleep quality across all treatment models. Although no significant benefits were found for those who received CBT-I+CPAP in the overall sample, there were indications that CBT-I might improve CPAP adherence among those with mild OSA. This study was supported by grant R01HL114529 from the National Institutes of Health.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sweetman, A., Lack, L., & Bastien, C. (2019) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci9120371 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Wallace, D. M., & Wohlgemuth, W. K. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine · doi:10.5664/jcsm.8094 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ong, J. C., Crawford, M. R., Wyatt, J. K., Fogg, L. F., Turner, A. D., Dawson, S. C., Edinger, J. D., Kushida, C. A., Abbott, S. M., Malkani, R. G., Attarian, H. P., & Zee, P. C.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Swansea University (GB)
- Rush University Medical Center (US)
- National Louis University (US)
- National Jewish Health (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Sleep
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- Supplement_1
- Pages
- A154-A154
- ISSN
- 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-9109
- OpenAlex
- W2936862162
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SLEEP (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
- Keywords
- cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, continuous positive airway pressure, obstructive sleep apnea, insomnia, comorbid insomnia and sleep apnea, CPAP adherence, treatment sequencing, sleep quality, insomnia severity, mild sleep apnea, treatment efficacy comparison, treatment acceptability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review