Cited by 29Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsSleep and related disorders

0068 ESTIMATION OF SLEEP STAGES USING CARDIAC AND ACCELEROMETER DATA FROM A WRIST-WORN DEVICE

Beattie, Z, Pantelopoulos, A, Ghoreyshi, A, Oyang, Y, Statan, A, Heneghan, C·2017·Sleep

Abstract

We investigated the ability of a wrist-worn tracker to estimate sleep stages in normal adult sleepers. Such a device could be useful in simplifying sleep research and in increasing public knowledge of sleep. Movement and cardiac data was collected from 60 adult subjects (36 M: 24 F, ages 34 ± 10 yrs) wearing two wrist worn devices (left and right hand) containing a 3D-accelerometer and an optical photoplethysmogram (PPG), while undergoing a sleep stage study using a Type III home sleep testing device. The accelerometer was used to generate various features of movement; the PPG records cardiac peaks generated by each heartbeat, and can be used to determine heart rate and heart rate variability metrics. The sleep study was scored independently by two registered PSG technicians, using consensus AASM scoring rules. Using these labels, an automated classifier and post-processing rule was developed to label 30-second epochs as one of Wake/Light/Deep/REM (note that Stages N1 and N2 were combined into a single “Light” classification). The estimated performance of this automated classifier system was calculated using a leave-one out validation method. The performance metrics were Cohen’s kappa (measures the level of agreement greater than chance) and per-epoch accuracy (percent of epochs correctly labeled). The estimated Cohen’s kappa was 0.52 ± 0.14 for left hand wear, and 0.53 ± 0.14 (right hand). The per-epoch accuracy was 69%. Across the population, there was no statistically significant bias in the estimated durations of the wake, light, deep and REM stages versus the gold standard measurements. These results suggest that a wrist worn device with movement and cardiac sensors can be used to determine sleep stages with a reasonable degree of accuracy in normal adult sleepers, but without the cost and artificial sleep environment of a sleep laboratory. The reported performance figures are similar or better than previously reported results from non-EEG based sleep staging using combinations of cardiac, respiratory and movement information. This work was supported by Fitbit.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleepj/zsx050.067

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fitbit has been found to accurately estimate sleep duration and quality in normal adult sleepers without the use of research-grade sleep staging equipment.

    “Although the specific algorithms that calculate these values are proprietary to Fitbit, they have been found to accurately estimate sleep duration and quality in normal adult sleepers without the use of research-grade sleep staging equipment.34”

    From Sleep quality, duration, and consistency are associated with better academic performance in college students (2019) · cites this paper as [34]

    The sleep-stage study passage (Results and Conclusion; page not supplied) reports no significant population-level bias in estimated stage durations and says a wrist-worn device can determine sleep stages with reasonable accuracy in normal adult sleepers without a sleep laboratory. It does not evaluate sleep quality as a separate measure or establish that the tested devices used Fitbit’s proprietary algorithms; it identifies Fitbit only as the funder. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beattie, Z., Pantelopoulos, A., Ghoreyshi, A., Oyang, Y., Statan, A., & Heneghan, C.
Affiliations
Fitbit (United States) (US)
Venue
Sleep
Published
2017-04-28
Volume
40
Issue
suppl_1
Pages
A26-A26
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W2608314851
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SLEEP (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
sleep stage estimation, wrist-worn devices, accelerometry, photoplethysmography, heart rate variability, home sleep testing, automated sleep staging, REM sleep, light sleep, slow-wave sleep, motion features, Fitbit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review