“Call-In, Call-Out, Care, and Cool Rationality: How Young Adults Respond to Racism and Sexism Online.”
Abstract
Despite the ubiquitous nature of racist and sexist discourses online, and evidence that racism and sexism are built into the architecture of online spaces, relatively little is known about how people respond to online inequalities. Using interview data with 60 young adults, I identify four response strategies which reproduce and contest racism and sexism in distinct ways. Viewing the problem as one of ignorance, white women and men of color are most likely to call-in and educate others about the emotional harm and fallacies of racism and sexism. Women of color call-out harassers, by rebutting misinformation and hate speech; they also check in, validate, and care for other women of color as a form of resistance. Focusing on so-called logic, facts, and cool rationality, white men intellectualize discrimination online. These responses are structured by race and gender, meaning they are outcomes of how discrimination is experienced and justified more broadly. This work draws further attention to the need to refine theories of racism and sexism, which do not yet take into account the cultural and structural implications of the consequences of online interactions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most internet users experience some negative interactions, such as racist and sexist discourses, in online spaces.
“Most internet users experience some negative interactions, such as racist and sexist discourses, in online spaces (Ortiz 2023).”
From Learning to Like the Likes and the Hate: The Labor of Internet Fame in the New Attention Economy (2026) · cites this paper as Ortiz 2023
Cites
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 29,585 · see citing works
Understanding Everyday Racism: An Interdisciplinary Theory
Essed, P. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781483345239 · Cited by 2,461 · see citing works
Harrell, S. P. (2000) · American Journal of Orthopsychiatry · doi:10.1037/h0087722 · Cited by 1,589 · see citing works
Hill Collins, P. (2002) · Routledge · doi:10.4324/9780203900055 · Cited by 1,532 · see citing works
Massanari, A. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815608807 · Cited by 1,264 · see citing works
Jackson, S. J., Bailey, M., & Foucault Welles, B. (2020) · MIT Press · doi:10.7551/mitpress/10858.001.0001 · Cited by 634 · see citing works
Critical technocultural discourse analysis
Brock, A. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444816677532 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Uncompensated emotional labor, racial battle fatigue, and (in)civility in digital spaces
Williams, A. A., Bryant, Z., & Carvell, C. (2019) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12658 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Learning to Like the Likes and the Hate: The Labor of Internet Fame in the New Attention Economy
Mears, A., & Beauvais, T. (2026) · Social Problems · doi:10.1093/socpro/spaf028 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ortiz, S. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Lowell (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ortiz, Stephanie M
- ORCID
- Ortiz, Stephanie M
- Venue
- Social Problems
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2021-10-19
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 665-681
- ISSN
- 0037-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-8533
- OpenAlex
- W3207828326
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 5.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Problems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Keywords
- racism, sexism, online harassment, hate speech, young adults, women of color, white men, intersectionality, response strategies, validation, resistance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review