The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phylogenetic Logistic Regression for Binary Dependent Variables
Abstract
We develop statistical methods for phylogenetic logistic regression in which the dependent variable is binary (0 or 1) and values are nonindependent among species, with phylogenetically related species tending to have the same value of the dependent variable. The methods are based on an evolutionary model of binary traits in which trait values switch between 0 and 1 as species evolve up a phylogenetic tree. The more frequently the trait values switch (i.e., the higher the rate of evolution), the more rapidly correlations between trait values for phylogenetically related species break down. Therefore, the statistical methods also give a way to estimate the phylogenetic signal of binary traits. More generally, the methods can be applied with continuous- and/or discrete-valued independent variables. Using simulations, we assess the statistical properties of the methods, including bias in the estimates of the logistic regression coefficients and the parameter that estimates the strength of phylogenetic signal in the dependent variable. These analyses show that, as with the case for continuous-valued dependent variables, phylogenetic logistic regression should be used rather than standard logistic regression when there is the possibility of phylogenetic correlations among species. Standard logistic regression does not properly account for the loss of information caused by resemblance of relatives and as a result is likely to give inflated type I error rates, incorrectly identifying regression parameters as statistically significantly different from zero when they are not.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology
Harvey, P. H., & Pagel, M. D. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198546412.001.0001 · Cited by 4,337
A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression
Heinze, G., & Schemper, M. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1047 · Cited by 2,711
Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation
Hansen, T. F. (1997) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb01457.x · Cited by 1,361
Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies
PAGEL, M. (1997) · Zoologica Scripta · doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.1997.tb00423.x · Cited by 1,106
Maddison, W. P. (1990) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05937.x · Cited by 533
A comment on phylogenetic correction
Rohlf, F. J. (2006) · Evolution · doi:10.1554/05-550.1 · Cited by 239
Cited by
A Linear-Time Algorithm for Gaussian and Non-Gaussian Trait Evolution Models
Tung Ho, L. S., & Ané, C. (2014) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syu005 · Cited by 1,085
Exploiting rRNA operon copy number to investigate bacterial reproductive strategies
Roller, B. R. K., Stoddard, S. F., & Schmidt, T. M. (2016) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.160 · Cited by 591
Global wildlife trade across the tree of life
Scheffers, B. R., Oliveira, B. F., Lamb, I., & Edwards, D. P. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aav5327 · Cited by 465
A Primer on Phylogenetic Generalised Least Squares
Symonds, M. R. E., & Blomberg, S. P. (2014) · Modern Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and Their Application in Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43550-2_5 · Cited by 445
Extinction risk is most acute for the world’s largest and smallest vertebrates
Ripple, W. J., Wolf, C., Newsome, T. M., Hoffmann, M., Wirsing, A. J., & McCauley, D. J. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1702078114 · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Ives, A. R., & Garland, T.
- Venue
- Systematic Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-11-04
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-26
- ISSN
- 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
- 1076-836X
- OpenAlex
- W2160276669
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 7.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogenetic Logistic Regression for Binary Dependent Variables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/sysbio/syp074
- The paper
- Ives, A. R., & Garland, T. (2010). Phylogenetic Logistic Regression for Binary Dependent Variables. Systematic Biology. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syp074
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.