The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feasibility of pediatric obesity and prediabetes treatment support through Tess, the AI behavioral coaching chatbot
Abstract
Behavioral intervention technologies (BITs) are unique ways to incorporate the benefits of technology and psychology to address differing health needs through various media, including Internet interventions, mobile apps, and video games. BITs present several possible benefits, including increased dissemination and accessibility, cost-effectiveness, increased engagement, and decreased stigma, especially among youth. A behavioral coaching chatbot, Tess, addresses different facets of behavioral health, such as depression and anxiety. Available 24/7, Tess delivers customized integrative support, psychoeducation, and interventions through brief conversations via existing communication channels (i.e., SMS text messaging and Facebook Messenger). This study assessed the feasibility of integrating Tess in behavioral counseling of adolescent patients (n = 23; Mage = 15.20 years; Rangeage = 9.78-18.54 years; 57% female) coping with weight management and prediabetes symptoms. Tess engaged patients via a preferred method of communication (SMS text messaging) in individualized conversations to promote treatment adherence, behavior change, and overall wellness. Adolescent patients reported experiencing positive progress toward their goals 81% of the time. The 4,123 messages exchanged and patients' reported usefulness ratings (96% of the time) illustrate that adolescents engaged with and viewed this chatbot as helpful. These results highlight the feasibility and benefit of support through artificial intelligence, specifically in a pediatric setting, which could be scaled to serve larger groups of patients. As a partner to clinicians, Tess can continue the therapeutic interaction outside office hours while maintaining patient satisfaction. Due to Tess's capacity for continuous learning, future iterations may have additional features to increase the user experience.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“First, AI chatbots can collect data sets from diverse sources: electronic health records, unstructured clinical notes, real-time physiological data points using additional sensors (eye-movement tracking, facial recognition, movement tracking, and heartbeat), and user interactions [5,6].”
From Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots for Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: Systematic Review. (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Third, AI chatbots can mimic real-life human support by offering services that can assist users in achieving their health behavior goals [6].”
From Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots for Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: Systematic Review. (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Out of the 15 studies, 11 (73%) reported the feasibility of AI chatbots in terms of (1) safety [22] (ie, no adverse events were reported), (2) messages exchanged with the chatbot [6,26,29,31,32], (3) retention rate [22,26], and (4) duration of engagement.”
From Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots for Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: Systematic Review. (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Many studies reported the total number of messages exchanged with the chatbot (5/15, 33%) [6,26,29,31,32]; however, only 7% (1/15) of studies reported the exact proportion of user-initiated conversations (approximately 30%) [6], which depicted the participants’ level of interest in having health-related conversations with the chatbot.”
From Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots for Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: Systematic Review. (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Out of the 15 studies, 3 (20%) studies [6,26,30] targeted medication or treatment adherence, but only 2 (67%) of these studies [26,30] reported the efficacy of AI chatbots in increasing treatment or medication adherence through timely and personalized reminders.”
From Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots for Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: Systematic Review. (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“In Tess [6], CBT was clubbed with the theory of emotionally focused therapy and motivational interviewing to assist the behavioral counseling of adolescent patients.”
From Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots for Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: Systematic Review. (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“The cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) was used in Tess [6], Lark Health Coach (HCAI) [28], and Woebot [31] to devise strategies that enhance self-efficacy and sustain behavior change.”
From Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots for Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: Systematic Review. (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Patients actively engaged with the chatbot, reported experiencing positive progress toward their goals, and deemed the chatbot helpful.”
In the citing paper
“These limitations can be overcome by utilizing AI chatbots, which have great potential to increase the accessibility and efficacy of personalized lifestyle modification programs [20, 21].”
From A systematic review of artificial intelligence chatbots for promoting physical activity, healthy diet, and weight loss (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“Enabling AI chatbots to communicate with individuals via web or mobile applications can make these personalized programs available 24/7 [21, 22].”
From A systematic review of artificial intelligence chatbots for promoting physical activity, healthy diet, and weight loss (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“While only 1 study [21] documented data security, none of the studies provided information on participant safety or ethics (i.e., ethical principle or standards with which the chatbot is designed).”
From A systematic review of artificial intelligence chatbots for promoting physical activity, healthy diet, and weight loss (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“One study did not specify when and how often the messages were delivered [21].”
From A systematic review of artificial intelligence chatbots for promoting physical activity, healthy diet, and weight loss (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“It was previously suggested that conversational agents can be influential and engaging for young patients, and that open-text answers are highly appreciated [104].”
In the citing paper
“Previous studies in other health domains have demonstrated promising results in using conversational agents to improve outcomes, such as promoting physical activity for childhood obesity [104,114].”
In the citing paper
“It was previously suggested that conversational agents can be influential and engaging for young patients, and that open-text answers are highly appreciated [104].”
Citations
Cites
Barlow, S. E., & and the Expert Committee (2007) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2007-2329c · Cited by 4,497
ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine
Weizenbaum, J. (1966) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/365153.365168 · Cited by 4,452
2013 AHA/ACC/TOS Guideline for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults
Jensen, M. D., Ryan, D. H., Apovian, C. M., Ard, J. D., Comuzzie, A. G., Donato, K. A., Hu, F. B., Hubbard, V. S., Jakicic, J. M., Kushner, R. F., et al. (2014) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.004 · Cited by 4,058
Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults and Youth: United States, 2015-2016.
Hales, C. M., Carroll, M. D., Fryar, C. D., & Ogden, C. L. (2017) · PubMed · Cited by 3,884
Gulliver, A., Griffiths, K. M., & Christensen, H. (2010) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-10-113 · Cited by 3,292
ELIZA — a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine
Weizenbaum, J. (1983) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/357980.357991 · Cited by 2,807
Fitzpatrick, K. K., Darcy, A., & Vierhile, M. (2017) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/mental.7785 · Cited by 2,730
Styne, D. M., Arslanian, S. A., Connor, E. L., Farooqi, I. S., Murad, M. H., Silverstein, J. H., & Yanovski, J. A. (2017) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2016-2573 · Cited by 1,375
Screening for Obesity in Children and Adolescents
US Preventive Services Task Force, Grossman, D. C., Bibbins-Domingo, K. B., Curry, S. J., Barry, M. J., Davidson, K. W., Doubeni, C. A., Epling, J. W., Kemper, A. R., Krist, A. H., et al. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.6803 · Cited by 841
Fulmer, R., Joerin, A., Gentile, B., Lakerink, L., & Rauws, M. (2018) · doi:10.2196/preprints.9782 · Cited by 715
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Children’s Hospital Association, 2014, 2013 survey findings of children’s hospitals obesity services, 1
- Johnson, 2008, Professional roles
- Poushter, 2018, Social Media Use Continues to Rise in Developing Countries but Plateaus Across Developed Ones
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A future for the world's children? A WHO–UNICEF–Lancet Commission
Clark, H., Coll-Seck, A. M., Banerjee, A., Peterson, S., Dalglish, S. L., Ameratunga, S., Balabanova, D., Bhan, M. K., Bhutta, Z. A., Borrazzo, J., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32540-1 · Cited by 1,105
Fulmer, R., Joerin, A., Gentile, B., Lakerink, L., & Rauws, M. (2018) · doi:10.2196/preprints.9782 · Cited by 715
Self-citationArtificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots for Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: Systematic Review.
Aggarwal, A., Tam, C. C., Wu, D., Li, X., & Qiao, S. (2023) · Journal of medical Internet research · doi:10.2196/40789 · Cited by 683
“The results of the quality assessment are presented in Multimedia Appendix 2 [5,6,21-33].”
InfluentialMilne-Ives, M., Lam, C., De Cock, C., Van Velthoven, M. H., & Meinert, E. (2020) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/17046 · Cited by 393
Zhang, J., Oh, Y. J., Lange, P., Yu, Z., & Fukuoka, Y. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/22845 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Stephens, T. N., Joerin, A., Rauws, M., & Werk, L. N.
- Affiliations
- Palo Alto University (US)
- xAI (United States) (US)
- University of Central Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stephens, Taylor N
- Venue
- Translational Behavioral Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-05-16
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 440-447
- ISSN
- 1613-9860 (ISSN-L)
- 1869-6716
- OpenAlex
- W2945732805
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 21.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Translational Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Keywords
- childhood obesity, prediabetes, adolescents, weight management, safety management systems, Facebook Messenger, medication adherence, behavior change, feasibility, psychoeducation
- MeSH terms
- Mentoring, Adolescent, Behavior Therapy, Communication, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Prediabetic State, Text Messaging, Mobile Applications, Pediatric Obesity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review