Cited by 74Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Text-based Healthcare Chatbots Supporting Patient and Health Professional Teams: Preliminary Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Childhood Obesity

Open access
Kowatsch, Tobias, Nißen, Marcia Katharina, Shih, Chen-Hsuan I., Rüegger, Dominik, Volland, Dirk, Filler, Andreas, Künzler, Florian, Barata, Filipe +7 more·2017·ETH Zurich

Abstract

Health professionals have limited resources and are not able to personally monitor and support patients in their everyday life.Against this background and due to the increasing number of self-service channels and digital health interventions, we investigate how text-based healthcare chatbots (THCB) can be designed to effectively support patients and health professionals in therapeutic settings beyond on-site consultations.We present an open source THCB system and how the THCP was designed for a childhood obesity intervention.Preliminary results with 15 patients indicate promising results with respect to intervention adherence (ca.13.000 conversational turns over the course of 4 months or ca. 8 per day and patient), scalability of the THCB approach (ca.99.5% of all conversational turns were THCB-driven) and over-average scores on perceived enjoyment and attachment bond between patient and THCB.Future work is discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.3929/ethz-b-000218776

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The design of MAX was driven by an interdisciplinary effort that resulted in a conceptual model with intervention components informed by human behavior and experiential learning theories, findings from technology acceptance research, and prior experiences of the authors with conversational agents.

    “The design of MAX was driven by an interdisciplinary effort that resulted in a conceptual model with intervention components informed by human behavior and experiential learning theories [61,65,66], findings from technology acceptance research [49,51,58,102], and prior experiences of the authors with conversational agents that support health care professionals and young adolescent patients [67,68]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Filler, A., Kowatsch, T., Haug, S., et al.: MobileCoach: A Novel Open Source Platform for the Design of Evidence-based, Scalable and Low-Cost Behavioral Health Interventions - Overview and Preliminary Evaluation in the Public Health Context. 14th annual Wireless Telecommunications Symposium (WTS 2015). IEEE, USA, New York (2015).
  2. Levinson, S.C.: Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press (1983).
  3. Nunamaker Jr., J.F., Derrick, D.C., Elkins, A.C., et al.: Embodied Conversational Agent- Based Kiosk for Automated Interviewing. Journal of Management Information Systems 28, 17-48 (2011).
  4. Silva, B.M.C., Rodrigues, J.J.P.C., La Torre Diez, I.d., et al.: Mobile-health: A review of current state in 2015. Journal of biomedical informatics 56, 265-272 (2015).
  5. Sun, D., Paredes, P., Canny, J.: MouStress: detecting stress from mouse motion. CHI '14 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 61- 70. ACM, Toronto, Canada (2014).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kowatsch, T., Nißen, M. K., Shih, C.-H. I., Rüegger, D., Volland, D., Filler, A., Künzler, F., Barata, F., Hung, S., Büchter, D., Brogle, B., Heldt, K., Gindrat, P., Farpour-Lambert, N., & l'Allemand, D.
Venue
ETH Zurich
Publisher
ETH Zurich
Published
2017
OpenAlex
W2783365884
Cited by
74
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4
FWCI
48.67
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (acceptedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (162724, 159289)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
childhood obesity, obesity intervention, patient support, healthcare teams, intervention adherence, perceived enjoyment, attachment bonds, digital health interventions, chatbots

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review