The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estrogenic Activity of Octylphenol, Nonylphenol, Bisphenol A and Methoxychlor in Rats
Abstract
Considerable attention has recently been focused on environmental chemicals that disrupt the reproductive system by altering steroid receptor function. Although numerous in vitro and in vivo methods have been shown to be useful approaches for identifying chemicals that can disrupt reproduction through a direct interaction with the estrogen receptor, it is imperative that the protocols selected be capable of detecting chemicals with a broad range of estrogenic activity. Here we evaluate the reliability of the 3-day uterotrophic assay for detecting chemicals with strong or weak estrogenic activity in both prepubertal and ovariectomized adult Long Evans rats. These data were compared to additional measures of estrogenic activity, which included the age of vaginal opening, the induction of cornified vaginal epithelial cells in ovariectomized adult rats, and estrous cyclicity in intact adult rats. Test chemicals selected for these studies included 17-beta-estradiol, ethynyl estradiol, methoxychlor, 4-tert-octylphenol, 4-nonylphenol and bisphenol A. Data from in vitro receptor binding assays compared the ability of the test chemicals to compete with [3H]-estradiol or [3H]-promegestone for binding to estrogen or progesterone receptors. As expected, the binding affinities for the estrogen receptor ranged from high to low, as reflected by Ki concentrations of 0.4 nM for 17-beta-estradiol and ethynyl estradiol, and 0.05-65 microM for 4-tert-octyphenol, 4-nonylphenol, and methoxychlor. Although none of the test chemicals demonstrated a high affinity for binding to the progesterone receptor, 4-tert-octylphenol and 4-nonylphenol exhibited a weak affinity, with Ki concentrations ranging from 1.2 to 3.8 microM. In vivo studies indicated that the 3-day uterotrophic assay in prepubertal rats was the best method for detecting estrogenic activity when compared with all other end points, based upon the dose-response data for ethynyl estradiol (0.01-0.1 mg/kg), 4-tert-octylphenol (50-200 mg/kg, oral), and 4-nonylphenol (25-100 mg/kg, oral). Although oral doses of ethynyl estradiol (0.01 mg/kg) and 4-nonylphenol (50 mg/kg) induced a significant increase in uterine weight in the prepubertal rats, these doses were ineffective for stimulating a similar response in ovariectomized adult rats. The age of vaginal opening was advanced following oral exposure from postnatal days 21-35 to ethynyl estradiol (0.01 mg/kg), methoxychlor (50 mg/kg), 4-tert-octylphenol (200 mg/kg), and 4-nonylphenol (50 mg/kg). Although bisphenol A (200 mg/kg, oral) induced a significant uterotrophic response within 3 days in prepubertal rats, doses up to 400 mg/kg failed to advance the age of vaginal opening. Monitoring changes in the vaginal epithelium of ovariectomized adult rats was the least effective method for detecting estrogenic activity for 4-tert-octylphenol and bisphenol A. The number of 4-5 day estrous cycles was reduced during a 25-day exposure to ethynyl estradiol (0.01 mg/kg), methoxychlor (50 mg/ kg), 4-tert-octylphenol (200 mg/kg), 4-nonylphenol (100 mg/kg), and bisphenol A (100 mg/kg) by oral gavage. Although long periods of extended diestrus (7-14 days) were generally correlated with exposure to ethynyl estradiol and 4-tert-octylphenol, the cycling patterns following exposure to methoxychlor, 4-nonylphenol and bisphenol A were not as clearly defined, with shorter periods of extended diestrus (4-7 days) and/or estrus (3-5 days) intermittently observed throughout the exposure period. Together these data provide a comparison of the 3-day uterotrophic assay with alternative measures of estrogenic activity for a group of test chemicals with a broad range of affinities for the estrogen receptor. These data can be useful during the assessment and validation of methods for screening environmental chemicals for endocrine disrupting activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yung-Chi, C., & Prusoff, W. H. (1973) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/0006-2952(73)90196-2 · Cited by 12,922
Cited by
Urinary Concentrations of Bisphenol A and 4-Nonylphenol in a Human Reference Population
Calafat, A. M., Kuklenyik, Z., Reidy, J. A., Caudill, S. P., Ekong, J., & Needham, L. L. (2005) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.7534 · Cited by 1,031
Matthews, J. B., Twomey, K., & Zacharewski, T. R. (2001) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx0001833 · Cited by 465
Exposure to endocrine disruptors during adulthood: consequences for female fertility
Rattan, S., Zhou, C., Chiang, C., Mahalingam, S., Brehm, E., & Flaws, J. A. (2017) · Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/joe-17-0023 · Cited by 339
Screening Chemicals for Estrogen Receptor Bioactivity Using a Computational Model
Browne, P., Judson, R. S., Casey, W. M., Kleinstreuer, N. C., & Thomas, R. S. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b02641 · Cited by 276
Oehlmann, J., Schulte-Oehlmann, U., Tillmann, M., & Markert, B. (2000) · Ecotoxicology · doi:10.1023/a:1008972518019 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Laws, S. C.
- Venue
- Toxicological Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-03-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 154-167
- ISSN
- 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2166537089
- Cited by
- 545
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estrogenic Activity of Octylphenol, Nonylphenol, Bisphenol A and Methoxychlor in Rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/toxsci/54.1.154
- The paper
- Laws, S. C. (2000). Estrogenic Activity of Octylphenol, Nonylphenol, Bisphenol A and Methoxychlor in Rats. Toxicological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/54.1.154
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.