The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of Cisplatin-Induced Nephrotoxicity by Microarray Technology
Abstract
Microarrays are a new technology used to study global gene expression and to decipher biological pathways. In the current study, microarrays were used to examine gene expression patterns associated with cisplatin-mediated nephrotoxicity. Sprague-Dawley rats received either single or seven daily ip doses of cisplatin (0.5 or 1 mg/kg/day) or the inactive isomer transplatin (1 or 3 mg/kg/day). Histopathological evaluation revealed renal proximal tubular necrosis in animals that received cisplatin for 7 days, but no hepatotoxic findings. Microarray analyses were performed using rat specific arrays containing 250 toxicity-related genes. Prominent gene expression changes were observed only in the kidneys of rats that received cisplatin for 7 days. Mechanistically, the gene expression pattern elicited by cisplatin (e.g., Bax upward arrow and SMP-30 downward arrow) suggested the occurrence of apoptosis and the perturbation of intracellular calcium homeostasis. The induction of multidrug resistance genes (MDR1 upward arrow, P-gp upward arrow) and tissue remodeling proteins (clusterin upward arrow, IGFBP-1 upward arrow, and TIMP-1 upward arrow) indicated the development of cisplatin resistance and tissue regeneration. Select gene expression changes were further confirmed by TaqMan analyses. Gene expression changes were not observed in the liver following cisplatin administration. In contrast to these in vivo findings, studies using NRK-52E kidney epithelial cells and clone-9 liver cells suggested that liver cells were more sensitive to cisplatin treatment. The discrepancies between the in vivo and in vitro results suggest that caution should be taken when extrapolating data from in vivo to in vitro systems. Nonetheless, the current study elucidates the biochemical pathways involved in cisplatin toxicity and demonstrates the utility of microarrays in toxicological studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Protein-1: Recent Findings and New Directions
Lee, P. D. K., Giudice, L. C., Conover, C. A., & Powell, D. R. (1997) · Experimental Biology and Medicine · doi:10.3181/00379727-216-44182 · Cited by 523 · cited 1×
“2), all of which have been associated with kidney remodeling after acute renal failure (Bohe et al. 1998; Gobe et al., 1995; Lee et al., 1997; Leonard et al., 1994; Silkensen et al., 1997).”
Background
Cited by
A new progeroid syndrome reveals that genotoxic stress suppresses the somatotroph axis
Niedernhofer, L. J., Garinis, G. A., Raams, A., Lalai, A. S., Robinson, A. R., Appeldoorn, E., Odijk, H., Oostendorp, R., Ahmad, A., van Leeuwen, W., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05456 · Cited by 669
Cisplatin-Associated Nephrotoxicity and Pathological Events
Taguchi, T., Nazneen, A., Abid, M. R., & Razzaque, M. S. (2005) · Contributions to Nephrology · doi:10.1159/000086055 · Cited by 256
Bin-Jaliah, I., & Sakr, H. (2018) · Physiology International · doi:10.1556/2060.105.2018.1.1 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, Q.
- Venue
- Toxicological Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-10-01
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 196-207
- ISSN
- 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170106455
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of Cisplatin-Induced Nephrotoxicity by Microarray Technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/toxsci/63.2.196
- The paper
- Huang, Q. (2001). Assessment of Cisplatin-Induced Nephrotoxicity by Microarray Technology. Toxicological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/63.2.196
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.