The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Nanoparticles in Mammalian Germline Stem Cells
Open accessAbstract
Gametogenesis is a complex biological process that is particularly sensitive to environmental insults such as chemicals. Many chemicals have a negative impact on the germline, either by directly affecting the germ cells, or indirectly through their action on the somatic nursing cells. Ultimately, these effects can inhibit fertility, and they may have negative consequences for the development of the offspring. Recently, nanomaterials such as nanotubes, nanowires, fullerene derivatives (buckyballs), and quantum dots have received enormous national attention in the creation of new types of analytical tools for biotechnology and the life sciences. Despite the wide application of nanomaterials, there is a serious lack of information concerning their impact on human health and the environment. Thus, there are limited studies available on toxicity of nanoparticles for risk assessment of nanomaterials. The purpose of this study was to assess the suitability of a mouse spermatogonial stem cell line as a model to assess nanotoxicity in the male germline in vitro. The effects of different types of nanoparticles on these cells were evaluated by light microscopy, and by cell proliferation and standard cytotoxicity assays. Our results demonstrate a concentration-dependent toxicity for all types of particles tested, whereas the corresponding soluble salts had no significant effect. Silver nanoparticles were the most toxic while molybdenum trioxide (MoO(3)) nanoparticles were the least toxic. Our results suggest that this cell line provides a valuable model with which to assess the cytotoxicity of nanoparticles in the germ line in vitro.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nanoparticle Uptake by the Rat Gastrointestinal Mucosa: Quantitation and Particle Size Dependency
Jani, P., Halbert, G. W., Langridge, J., & Florence, A. T. (1990) · Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.2042-7158.1990.tb07033.x · Cited by 920
Cited by
Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: Sources and toxicity
Buzea, C., Pacheco, I. I., & Robbie, K. (2007) · Biointerphases · doi:10.1116/1.2815690 · Cited by 3,789
Negligible Particle-Specific Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles
Xiu, Z.-M., Zhang, Q.-B., Puppala, H. L., Colvin, V. L., & Alvarez, P. J. J. (2012) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl301934w · Cited by 2,108
Ferdous, Z., & Nemmar, A. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21072375 · Cited by 1,019
Masters, E. A., Trombetta, R. P., de Mesy Bentley, K. L., Boyce, B. F., Gill, A. L., Gill, S. R., Nishitani, K., Ishikawa, M., Morita, Y., Ito, H., et al. (2019) · Bone Research · doi:10.1038/s41413-019-0061-z · Cited by 575
You, C., Han, C., Wang, X., Zheng, Y., Li, Q., Hu, X., & Sun, H. (2012) · Molecular Biology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11033-012-1792-8 · Cited by 447
Metadata
- Authors
- Braydich-Stolle, L., Hussain, S., Schlager, J. J., & Hofmann, M.-C.
- Venue
- Toxicological Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-07-13
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 412-419
- ISSN
- 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-6080
- OpenAlex
- W2111812837
- Cited by
- 1,247
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Nanoparticles in Mammalian Germline Stem Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/toxsci/kfi256
- The paper
- Braydich-Stolle, L., Hussain, S., Schlager, J. J., & Hofmann, M.-C. (2005). In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Nanoparticles in Mammalian Germline Stem Cells. Toxicological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfi256
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.