The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Penetration of Intact Skin by Quantum Dots with Diverse Physicochemical Properties
Open accessAbstract
Skin is the largest organ of the body and is a potential route of exposure to engineered nanomaterials, but the permeability of the skin to these nanomaterials is unknown. We selected commercially available quantum dots (QD) of two core/shell sizes and shapes and three different surface coatings to determine if QD could penetrate intact skin in a size- or coating-dependent manner. Spherical 4.6 nm core/shell diameter QD 565 and ellipsoid 12 nm (major axis) by 6 nm (minor axis) core/shell diameter QD 655 with neutral (polyethylene glycol), anionic (carboxylic acids) or cationic (polyethylene glycol-amine) coatings were topically applied to porcine skin in flow-through diffusion cells at an occupationally relevant dose for 8 h and 24 h. Confocal microscopy revealed that spherical QD 565 of each surface coating penetrated the stratum corneum and localized within the epidermal and dermal layers by 8 h. Similarly, polyethylene glycol- and polyethylene glycol-amine-coated ellipsoid QD 655 localized within the epidermal layers by 8 h. No penetration of carboxylic acid-coated QD 655 was evident until 24 h, at which time localization in the epidermal layers was observed. This study showed that quantum dots of different sizes, shapes, and surface coatings can penetrate intact skin at an occupationally relevant dose within the span of an average-length work day. These results suggest that skin is surprisingly permeable to nanomaterials with diverse physicochemical properties and may serve as a portal of entry for localized, and possibly systemic, exposure of humans to QD and other engineered nanoscale materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the Cyto‐Toxicity Caused by Quantum Dots
Shiohara, A., Hoshino, A., Hanaki, K., Suzuki, K., & Yamamoto, K. (2004) · Microbiology and Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1348-0421.2004.tb03478.x · Cited by 385
Comparative Anatomy, Physiology, and Biochemistry of Mammalian Skin
Monteiro-Riviere, N. A. (2020) · Dermal and Ocular Toxicology · doi:10.1201/9781003069126-2 · Cited by 35
Self-citation
Cited by
New Generation Adsorbents for Water Treatment
Ali, I. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300133d · Cited by 1,758
Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy: Current Progress and Challenges
Gavas, S., Quazi, S., & Karpiński, T. M. (2021) · Nanoscale Research Letters · doi:10.1186/s11671-021-03628-6 · Cited by 1,069
Toxicology of nanoparticles: A historical perspective
Oberdörster, G., Stone, V., & Donaldson, K. (2007) · Nanotoxicology · doi:10.1080/17435390701314761 · Cited by 964
Grey Goo on the Skin? Nanotechnology, Cosmetic and Sunscreen Safety
Nohynek, G. J., Lademann, J., Ribaud, C., & Roberts, M. S. (2007) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.1080/10408440601177780 · Cited by 644
Nanotechnology Safety Concerns Revisited
Stern, S. T., & McNeil, S. E. (2008) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfm169 · Cited by 560
Metadata
- Authors
- Ryman-Rasmussen, J. P., Riviere, J. E., & Monteiro-Riviere, N. A.
- Venue
- Toxicological Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-01-27
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 159-165
- ISSN
- 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-6080
- OpenAlex
- W2107291346
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 25.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Penetration of Intact Skin by Quantum Dots with Diverse Physicochemical Properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/toxsci/kfj122
- The paper
- Ryman-Rasmussen, J. P., Riviere, J. E., & Monteiro-Riviere, N. A. (2006). Penetration of Intact Skin by Quantum Dots with Diverse Physicochemical Properties. Toxicological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfj122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.