The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computational Toxicology—A State of the Science Mini Review
Abstract
Advances in computer sciences and hardware combined with equally significant developments in molecular biology and chemistry are providing toxicology with a powerful new tool box. This tool box of computational models promises to increase the efficiency and the effectiveness by which the hazards and risks of environmental chemicals are determined. Computational toxicology focuses on applying these tools across many scales, including vastly increasing the numbers of chemicals and the types of biological interactions that can be evaluated. In addition, knowledge of toxicity pathways gathered within the tool box will be directly applicable to the study of the biological responses across a range of dose levels, including those more likely to be representative of exposures to the human population. Progress in this field will facilitate the transformative shift called for in the recent report on toxicology in the 21st century by the National Research Council. This review surveys the state of the art in many areas of computational toxicology and points to several hurdles that will be important to overcome as the field moves forward. Proof-of-concept studies need to clearly demonstrate the additional predictive power gained from these tools. More researchers need to become comfortable working with both the data generating tools and the computational modeling capabilities, and regulatory authorities must show a willingness to the embrace new approaches as they gain scientific acceptance. The next few years should witness the early fruits of these efforts, but as the National Research Council indicates, the paradigm shift will take a long term investment and commitment to reach full potential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Identification and Review of Sensitivity Analysis Methods
Christopher Frey, H., & Patil, S. R. (2002) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/0272-4332.00039 · Cited by 1,036
O’Brien, P. J., Irwin, W., Diaz, D., Howard-Cofield, E., Krejsa, C. M., Slaughter, M. R., Gao, B., Kaludercic, N., Angeline, A., Bernardi, P., et al. (2006) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-006-0091-3 · Cited by 609
Physicochemical modelling of cell signalling pathways
Aldridge, B. B., Burke, J. M., Lauffenburger, D. A., & Sorger, P. K. (2006) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1497 · Cited by 592
Environmental Biology and Human Disease
Schwartz, D., & Collins, F. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1141331 · Cited by 86
Cited by
Review of risk from potential emerging contaminants in UK groundwater
Stuart, M., Lapworth, D., Crane, E., & Hart, A. (2012) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.11.072 · Cited by 801
Adaptation of High-Throughput Screening in Drug Discovery—Toxicological Screening Tests
Szymański, P., Markowicz, M., & Mikiciuk-Olasik, E. (2011) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms13010427 · Cited by 454
Systems Toxicology: From Basic Research to Risk Assessment
Sturla, S. J., Boobis, A. R., FitzGerald, R. E., Hoeng, J., Kavlock, R. J., Schirmer, K., Whelan, M., Wilks, M. F., & Peitsch, M. C. (2014) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx400410s · Cited by 366
Self-citationIn silico toxicology for the pharmaceutical sciences☆
Valerio Jr., L. G. (2009) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2009.08.022 · Cited by 296
Computational toxicology of pharmaceuticals
Tugcu, G., Sipahi, H., Charehsaz, M., Aydın, A., & Saçan, M. T. (2023) · Cheminformatics, QSAR and Machine Learning Applications for Novel Drug Development · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-18638-7.00007-4 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Kavlock, R. J., Ankley, G., Blancato, J., Breen, M., Conolly, R., Dix, D., Houck, K., Hubal, E., Judson, R., Rabinowitz, J., Richard, A., Setzer, R. W., Shah, I., Villeneuve, D., & Weber, E.
- Venue
- Toxicological Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-12-07
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-27
- ISSN
- 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-6080
- OpenAlex
- W2169600586
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational Toxicology—A State of the Science Mini Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/toxsci/kfm297
- The paper
- Kavlock, R. J., Ankley, G., Blancato, J., Breen, M., Conolly, R., Dix, D., Houck, K., Hubal, E., Judson, R., Rabinowitz, J., Richard, A., Setzer, R. W., Shah, I., Villeneuve, D., & Weber, E. (2008). Computational Toxicology—A State of the Science Mini Review. Toxicological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfm297
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.