The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cellular Stress Response Pathway System as a Sentinel Ensemble in Toxicological Screening
Abstract
High costs, long test times, and societal concerns related to animal use have required the development of in vitro assays for the rapid and cost-effective toxicological evaluation and characterization of compounds in both the pharmaceutical and environmental arenas. Although the pharmaceutical industry has developed very effective, high-throughput in vitro assays for determining the therapeutic potential of compounds, the application of this approach to toxicological screening has been limited. A primary reason for this is that while drug candidate screens are directed to a specific target/mechanism, xenobiotics can cause toxicity through any of a myriad of undefined interactions with cellular components and processes. Given that it is not practical to design assays that can interrogate each potential toxicological target, an integrative approach is required if there is to be a rapid and low-cost toxicological evaluation of chemicals. Cellular stress response pathways offer a viable solution to the creation of a set of integrative assays as there is a limited and hence manageable set (a small ensemble of 10 or less) of major cellular stress response pathways through which cells mount a homoeostatic response to toxicants and which also participate in cell fate/death decisions. Further, over the past decades, these pathways have been well characterized at a molecular level thereby enabling the development of high-throughput cell-based assays using the components of the pathways. Utilization of the set of cellular stress response pathway-based assays as indicators of toxic interactions of chemicals with basic cellular machinery will potentially permit the clustering of chemicals based on biological response profiles of common mode of action (MOA) and also the inference of the specific MOA of a toxicant. This article reviews the biochemical characteristics of the stress response pathways, their common architecture that enables rapid activation during stress, their participation in cell fate decisions, the essential nature of these pathways to the organism, and the biochemical basis of their cross-talk that permits an assay ensemble screening approach. Subsequent sections describe how the stress pathway ensemble assay approach could be applied to screening potentially toxic compounds and discuss how this approach may be used to derive toxicant MOA from the biological activity profiles that the ensemble strategy provides. The article concludes with a review of the application of the stress assay concept to noninvasive in vivo assessments of chemical toxicants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
NF-κB regulation in the immune system
Li, Q., & Verma, I. M. (2002) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri910 · Cited by 4,007
Cell Survival Responses to Environmental Stresses Via the Keap1-Nrf2-ARE Pathway
Kensler, T. W., Wakabayashi, N., & Biswal, S. (2007) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.46.120604.141046 · Cited by 3,630
Integrating cell-signalling pathways with NF-κB and IKK function
Perkins, N. D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2083 · Cited by 2,350
Definition of a consensus binding site for p53
El-Deiry, W. S., Kern, S. E., Pietenpol, J. A., Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1992) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0492-45 · Cited by 1,985
Dinkova-Kostova, A. T., Holtzclaw, W. D., Cole, R. N., Itoh, K., Wakabayashi, N., Katoh, Y., Yamamoto, M., & Talalay, P. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.172398899 · Cited by 1,947
Transcriptional control of human p53-regulated genes
Riley, T., Sontag, E., Chen, P., & Levine, A. (2008) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2395 · Cited by 1,921
ER Stress Induces Cleavage of Membrane-Bound ATF6 by the Same Proteases that Process SREBPs
Ye, J., Rawson, R. B., Komuro, R., Chen, X., Davé, U. P., Prywes, R., Brown, M. S., & Goldstein, J. L. (2000) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00133-7 · Cited by 1,871
Nrf2–Keap1 defines a physiologically important stress response mechanism
Motohashi, H., & Yamamoto, M. (2004) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2004.09.003 · Cited by 1,725 · cited 1×
“30 2006) and Nrf2-Keap1 (Motohashi and Yamamoto, 2004).”
Transparent Adult Zebrafish as a Tool for In Vivo Transplantation Analysis
White, R. M., Sessa, A., Burke, C., Bowman, T., LeBlanc, J., Ceol, C., Bourque, C., Dovey, M., Goessling, W., Burns, C. E., et al. (2008) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2007.11.002 · Cited by 1,408
Rescue of embryonic lethality in Mdm2-deficient mice by absence of p53
Jones, S. N., Roe, A. E., Donehower, L. A., & Bradley, A. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/378206a0 · Cited by 1,280
Cited by
Navigating Transcriptomic Connectivity Mapping Workflows to Link Chemicals with Bioactivities
Shah, I., Bundy, J., Chambers, B., Everett, L. J., Haggard, D., Harrill, J., Judson, R. S., Nyffeler, J., & Patlewicz, G. (2022) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.2c00245 · Cited by 19
Park, S.-M., Choi, M.-S., Kim, S., Jegal, H., Han, H.-Y., Chun, H. S., Kim, S. K., & Oh, J.-H. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-54634-4 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Simmons, S. O., Fan, C.-Y., & Ramabhadran, R.
- Venue
- Toxicological Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-07-30
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 202-225
- ISSN
- 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-6080
- OpenAlex
- W2164610579
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 22.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellular Stress Response Pathway System as a Sentinel Ensemble in Toxicological Screening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/toxsci/kfp140
- The paper
- Simmons, S. O., Fan, C.-Y., & Ramabhadran, R. (2009). Cellular Stress Response Pathway System as a Sentinel Ensemble in Toxicological Screening. Toxicological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfp140
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.